Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Co Leader Changes

Started by Midknight [332505] on in Suggestions.

9 replies · 187 views · thread synced · 9 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 10 / 10 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
10
Discussion span
→
People posting
7
Likes on archived posts
15
Authority score
27 / 100
Historical score
27 / 100
Story score
48 / 100
Engagement score
54 / 100
Midknight [332505]

Co leader should be a powerful position and reducing the abilities hurts a factions growth drastically.

Can't do naps, Can't change permissions, Can't use the lab, Can't change upgrades.

So the only way for a faction to stay active if the leader say goes on a vacation, is to change leaders?

Really need to fix this as the game's going to hell in a shit basket.
MarlonBrando [1337797]
In the past, coleaders have emptied faction cash, points, armouries. kicked faction members, sold factions etc, and this approach now appears to be unfortunately a game strategy with no faction lifetime trust, honor and commitment.
Leaders should have the abiility to override/confirm coleader faction actions, therebye reversing unfortunate attempts for cash etc. so both leaders and coleaders can be more confidently appointed with minimal overall faction risk.

There are also good examples of coleaders taking over , rebuilding factions in the HOF, example: Good luck HT Jobo and HT Supermikk rebuilding HT HOF warring faction. Hoorah

"
--Jobo-- came back to HT and at 0 days in faction he is leader and kick ALL of us."
CravenTHC [1569996]

What is with the drama lightning rods in this thread?!?

"Really need to fix this as the game's going to hell in a shit basket."

This just isn't necessary in a suggestion post. I'm with you on the changes, as it has made my job infinitely more difficult, but leave the personal squabbles and feels out of your suggestion.

@JB:

First of all, there has been no announcement saying that this is how it's going to stay. You stating that this is now a game feature seem rather arrogant of you.

Second, the ability for a leader to "override" a co-leader's actions defeats the purpose of giving them permissions in the first place. The override feature would require the leader to be online at the time o the unwanted action/actions.

Third, there is absolutely no reason for you to go around sharing other peoples business on the public forums. If they share it then that is their business. Your prerogative should be your own business. You could have easily illustrated that point without parading HT's personal stuff around as if they are a third rate sports team that just needs a good draft year.

Muffassa [699507]

Faction co-leaders should be able to help run it, but for the simple fact that upgrades can't be made, what is the point... I've put some money into the faction, where I am co.. and I can't spend the money.. :S lol

That my friend, is an Fail on the Epic Scale :)

Any changes in the future??
TheDarkLegacy [1712562]

You give someone the position so they can help out with declaring wars then suddenly they spend all the respect the faction has on adept just to troll you before filling the armoury with lead pipes that can't be removed and leaving.

Sound like fun? Welcome to Factions 2.0
Midknight [332505]

This is a very old thread but only an idiot would give any type of leadership to somoene they don't whole heartedly trust.
Midknight [332505]

Sadly then you're just one of those idiots then. There are plenty of people on Torn I trust way more than people I can punch in the face in RL
Bloods [1897613]
" --Jobo-- came back to HT and at 0 days in faction he is leader and kick ALL of us." <--- It was planned before it happened and already mentioned so people already knew. He was changing the faction up because of HT not being "HT" anymore.