Bear with me this has the potential to be long as f**k...
I have been doing some further study recently and came into a bit of conflict with one of our lecturers around personality typing. They were preaching the "DISC" method which has four personality categories:
- Dominant,
- Inspiring,
- Supportive, and
- Cautious.
My main complaint with these types of tests is that they often make assumptions about the type of person you are; like if you are loud you are a good leader, if you are quiet you are creative, if you are artistic you are a good entrepeneur...etc. Maybe before the internet became a big thing these might have been true but mostly just seem like outdated ways of talking about people to me. Especially because when you are talking about things like leadership and entrepreneurs there are more and more examples of it being done a little bit differently by people and being amazing. Doesnt seem to be a one-kind-of-person deal.
I guess also because I am a quieter person I get frustrated with lists that note Quiet and Shy as bad things, or representative of not being a good leader etc.
All of this said I feel a bit differently about the Meyers-Briggs personality tests as they seem to type people without making a*****e inferences inside of those types.
Anyway just wondered if anyone else had thoughts about personality testing?
I am an INFJ on Meyers-Briggs, and came out as an S on the DISC one...