Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Net neutrality

Started by Mat-Senpai [952164] on in Politics & Law.

92 replies · 574 views · thread synced · 6 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 93 / 93 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
93
Discussion span
→
Authority score
12 / 100
Historical score
19 / 100
Story score
46 / 100
Engagement score
77 / 100

People posting, likes and official posts are not counted for this thread yet: on threads longer than one page they come from a periodic pass over the archive, which has not covered it.

Most-liked replies

Mat-Senpai [952164]

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/technology/fcc-net-neutrality.html

So it's official, the US has removed net neutrality, to give you a short summary of what this means - ISPs (AT&T etc) now have the right to block websites as they want, not only that but they also can charge you to view some websites (youtube, netflix) - they can also slow down some websites... so if an ISP invests in Hulu and decides they wont want you to watch netflix as much? completely legal to reduce your speed.

RIP.




Mat-Senpai [952164]

This might come off like a joke post, I honestly am sad for everyone from the USA and your greedy companies. I hope this is something that is fixed "soon".
Tolshortte [648554]

I'm glad they did it. its the "one step too far" that will probably get shit turned around.

you can bomb other countries, take away rights, let criminal out of prison, be lenient on abusers, elect idiots, etc. but if you **** with HBO you will have a shit storm on your hands. the first time someone misses or lags through games of thrones head will roll.

mark my words.
Mat-Senpai [952164]

Happens already in places like mexico where you have to pay for phone plans to include whatsapp or twitter as it is. That being said as it looks even if a million people marched on them nothing will change.
Quickdraw [915500]

I think this is a bigger deal than some of you guys realize. This is about keeping control of the information in the hands of the rich. It is prohibitively expensive to start new print or television media, but it can still be done on the internet by people who aren't rich. If net neutrality is removed it will become prohibitively expensive to start an internet media business and the rich will be able to control the information we see even more than they do now.
Sagramor [1908287]

Vote isn't happening until December 14th. Probably be some 1st amendment challenges. The internet is a utility supporting a huge part of the economy. Meanwhile AT&T is trying to merge with Time Warner leading to a massive anti-trust case. So if Gates or Bezos piss off a Comcast or Verizon exec, they can turn around and slowdown the microsoft or amazon sites? Slower updates and slower bids?

The whole idea is shit and anyone who regularly drinks out of an oversized novelty cup probably a) doesnt give a shit how poor his judgment is b)is definitely susceptible to graft and c)is p.o.s. coward
Zziox [1022655]

Bad thing is that if the US allows this then other countries will slowly follow suit. Sucks ass and should not be allowed
Remilia [1284087]

It's literally nothing.

What is a more likely to happen if this pushes through is that your ISP will continue to allow access to every site but will be able to charge extremely high bandwidth users that are literally slowing the entire internet down for everyone, either more money or throttle their bandwidth. This needs to happen eventually because infrastructure improvements can't keep up with demand.

Video streaming is literally killing the internet.
Mat-Senpai [952164]

He is wrong, American ISPs have a history already of illegally slowing down connections to sites like Netflix and boosting connections go sites which test your internet spees.

It does make me smile that some people do trust big business, I guess once you overlook all the shit they've done you can lie to yourself and convince yourself it'll be fine.
Viracocha [1772040]

Oh goody on top of shitty service, I'm sure our Canadian TelCos (The Big 3), are already twisting the screws on the CRTC to have this as a paradigm for Canada as well.