Finally. You guys are slow.
Well, no more indictments. I can't wait to scan through it.
I hope there's proof of Clinton collusion with Russia about the Steele Dossier. There better be.
After two ****ing years, it better have something.
SDNY investigation will probably have more heft then the SCO findings, just sayin'
alright frens
time for a run down
Yet nothing in the report, and now those Dems waiting for the Mueller Report want to question him. They won't accept the findings.
Nothing but 2 years of sabotage and neurosis.
Just think what all that energy could have done for US; for the world.
Morons the lot.
Sag, sorry you haven't got a head for your pike, maybe you could focus on Trudeau and SNC Lavalin. Lots of meat on the bone there. Or is his Liberal status off limits for the likes of you?
Nothing in the report? Did Barr forward you a copy of the report? Do share, waiting for him to decide how much US Congress gets to see is slowing down the release of knowledge to the public.
JWR and JP need to either speak or shut the **** up. Parliamentary privilege already provides them safety from prosecution to speak upon request to the Speaker - and Trudeau already said they can talk about everything SNC but yet they still try and 'oh well, I dunno what I can or not ..." is just complete nonsense. They're working hard to help lil' Andy.
TRUMP 2020!!! All these liberals are so pissed!!! NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION!!!
how-william-barr-did-old-man-back-flips-to-avoid-arresting-donald-trump"They didn’t consider whether Trump obstructed the crime that he appears to have obstructed. They considered whether he obstructed a different crime. And having considered whether Trump obstructed the crime he didn’t commit, rather than considering whether he obstructed the crime he did commit, they decided not to charge him with a crime."
What makes you think Trudeau is more susceptible then Trump? If you're comparing obstruction of justice then our system's quirks of a shared justice minister/AG then a conflict of interest at the highest level is entirely possible, and ran into a roadblock when political considerations came into conflict with the judicial considerations. That aside, the prosecutorial decisions did lie with JWR, and JT and co. erred in attempting to massage the message on behalf of SNC of all disreputable companies. Whether it amounts to a criminal act is probably unlikely, whereas in the US example we have the newly appointed AG directly contradicting his statements during the hearing:
"Obviously, the President and any other official can commit obstruction in this classic sense of sabotaging a proceeding’s truth-finding function. Thus, for example, if a President knowingly destroys or alters evidence, suborns perjury, or induces a witness to change testimony, or commits any act deliberately impairing the integrity or availability of evidence, then he, like anyone else, commits the crime of
obstruction."
“Do you believe a president could lawfully issue a pardon in exchange for the recipient’s promise not incriminate him?” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Barr during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“No, that would be a crime,” Barr said.
​And again: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4775125/senator-klobuchar-questions-william-barr-obstruction-justice
So while you'd like to present yourself as all-knowing (the report hasn't been publicly released) then what you're instead doing is abetting a narrative that clearly does not support the underlying facts of the matter....which I suppose merely reinforces the narrative you choose to select.
More than likely Mueller will present his findings in Congress at a later date.
edit: and Barr too:
"In light of the very concerning discrepancies and final decision making at the Justice Department following the Special Counsel report, where Mueller did not exonerate the President, we will be calling Attorney General Barr in to testify before
@HouseJudiciary in the near future." - @RepJerryNadler
**** the investigation lol.
its hilarious people think this is winning
Awesome. trumps better than hillary. cool hat bro.. so edgy lol. im sure you slay salty liberals.. he's gonna build that wall alright. maybe in another 4 years trump can get that wall renovated lmao..
so much winning
[image: i.snag.gy][image: i.snag.gy]
****ing snowflakes man.. i got someone reporting my posts.
must of triggered a trump supporter. they trying to shut me up lol..
[image: i.snag.gy]
"the spirit of party"
serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.
--George Washington, 1796
(quoted this post because it's shorter than your last one)
The suicide rats one specifically is being seen in two communities specifically isn't showing suicides. Just drug od's. But suicide rates are on the rise in specifically Trans and White/Caucasian Men. Because of the unhealthy deterrence of mental health issues, and a large number of other reasons that I don't really feel like talking about. But a large majority of them like progressive movements for Gender Fluidity which has the idea of telling people to change themselves instead of trying to teach them to be comfortable with who they are. Which you will never be able to change everything about yourself. Pushing you to depression and eventually suicide because of not being taught how to cope with anxiety, depression or just the general notion of not being able to accept yourself. Can't really blame that on trump. I can see why certain other things can be blamed on him but suicide rates aren't his fault.
i dont blame trump for that. i actually like trump even though im critical of him. hes done as good as you could ask of any president. ied be content with 4 more years. im not gonna suck his farts though. im an young american. im gonna talk shit about any politician just for fun man.
im just making the point its stupid to celebrate something as insignificant as this as a win. the president is spose to be a serious job. a tough job.
we knew months ago that trump was most likely innocent, but had dirty people around him. who he's defended religiously btw. thats not winning to me. what have i gained from this? what has america gained from this? some twisted reality tv entertainment?
i apologize for being a debbie downer. thats just how it is to me.
I can respect that. I also don't like everything trump has done> But he's our POTUS and should at least be seen with that respect(not saying that you don't). So many people don't understand that and that if the same vilification was happening to Barrack Obama, they'd be up in arms saying everyone is racist or that we should respect the POTUS. It's just crazy to me is all
"So many people don't understand that and that if the same vilification was happening to Barrack Obama"
- birther movement (Trump)
- tan suit scandal
- is a "muslim terrorist"
- adhering to court orders to return frozen assets to Iran (read: 'ZOMG the gave the 9/11 Iran terrorists American money!')
Just 4 quick things right off the bat ... There's much more ...
Everything about Trump and all his lies brought everything on. Innocent or not, he made every effort to look guilty so he could act the victim. Will wait for the full report before making any fuller conclusion ..... Though we've learned from Barr's summary the scope of the collusion investigation was actually quite limited looking only at the IRA and Kremlin connections, which is where they couldn't "conclusively define" Trump-Kremlin collusion ........