If we can bet 100m in black jack why shouldn't there bet a button for betting 5m and 100m on slots? After all it is our money. If you run out of money that's why there is the loan shark.
Gambling-slots
Started by HELL [283717] on in Suggestions.
About this thread
Posts archived: 3 / 3 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.
- Archived posts
- 3
- Discussion span
- →
- People posting
- 2
- Likes on archived posts
- 2
- Authority score
- 24 / 100
- Historical score
- 14 / 100
- Story score
- 30 / 100
- Engagement score
- 34 / 100
bump
I am not sure of this. The gap is a huge magnitude. 10 $1m's to 10 $10ms one thing thing. 10 $10ms to 10 $100ms is another
In Blackjack, you could get $100m or a $150m (or $200m or $300m if you split with $100m initial bets) but in slots, you can get far larger amounts if you spun that much, not a double or a double with a bonus like in blackjack.
Having these implemented imagine the outputs from getting a road rage or a radioactive or serious duck hunter or whatever. Prices could rise in item market just from a slot output of a $100m spin, unless if Casino is taking a loss per spin (I doubt that'd be set like that), then outputs seem more difficult while Casino keeps banking.
Yes it's random for anyone to win, but I bet many will scorn when seeing an inactive person or a new person come next day spin a $10 win $53b after several weeks of jackpot rising.
Really though imagine those radioactive wins... regardless though:
I'm leaning towards not having this in place.
& not everyone gets a loan to recover from a $100m spin from Duke.
In Blackjack, you could get $100m or a $150m (or $200m or $300m if you split with $100m initial bets) but in slots, you can get far larger amounts if you spun that much, not a double or a double with a bonus like in blackjack.
Having these implemented imagine the outputs from getting a road rage or a radioactive or serious duck hunter or whatever. Prices could rise in item market just from a slot output of a $100m spin, unless if Casino is taking a loss per spin (I doubt that'd be set like that), then outputs seem more difficult while Casino keeps banking.
Yes it's random for anyone to win, but I bet many will scorn when seeing an inactive person or a new person come next day spin a $10 win $53b after several weeks of jackpot rising.
Really though imagine those radioactive wins... regardless though:
I'm leaning towards not having this in place.
& not everyone gets a loan to recover from a $100m spin from Duke.