I invite anyone able and willing to seriously dicuss all things Karl Marx did and wrote; not focusing on his (and our) political opinion and work, but his historical and economic research that has been ingored and denied because of what his name implies politically.
marxism
Started by gagaronpiu [2098748] on in Politics & Law.
About this thread
Posts archived: 2 / 2 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.
- Archived posts
- 2
- Discussion span
- →
- People posting
- 2
- Likes on archived posts
- 3
- Authority score
- 5 / 100
- Historical score
- 7 / 100
- Story score
- 22 / 100
- Engagement score
- 33 / 100
In capitalism, this manifests itself in the conflict between the ruling classes (known as the bourgeoisie) that control the means of production and the working classes (known as the proletariat) that enable these means by selling their labour power in return for wages.[16] Employing a critical approach known as historical materialism, Marx predicted that, like previous socio-economic systems, capitalism produced internal tensions which would lead to its self-destruction and replacement by a new system known as socialism.
How can you not bring politics into economics? Because you don't want anyone to know that the economy (Venezuela) is ruined by socialism?
The stock market fluctuates dramatically over a f**king President Trump tweet. Not a bad thing apparently.
Karl Marx is a fail and should be forgotten. I hear Che Guevarra is still popular.
How can you not bring politics into economics? Because you don't want anyone to know that the economy (Venezuela) is ruined by socialism?
The stock market fluctuates dramatically over a f**king President Trump tweet. Not a bad thing apparently.
Karl Marx is a fail and should be forgotten. I hear Che Guevarra is still popular.