I’ve come to understand you cannot put parcels in parcels. Can we change that? I feel like there’s somehow a missed opportunity here. Thanks :)
Parcels.
Started by Snoop_poop [2511975] on in Suggestions.
About this thread
Posts archived: 7 / 7 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.
- Archived posts
- 7
- Discussion span
- →
- People posting
- 5
- Likes on archived posts
- 1
- Authority score
- 25 / 100
- Historical score
- 17 / 100
- Story score
- 32 / 100
- Engagement score
- 41 / 100
but why...?
Games! Parcels that include big booms and also big rewards, infinitely wrapped gifts for giggles. it’s not game changing, I can’t see how it’d hurt?
Its a waste of time and effort to implement, ched would never go for it.
These developers don't work for free, you know that right? He's not gonna pay them to implement something that doesn't improve game play what so ever, so you can stick boxes inside eachother to play little games, bud.
These developers don't work for free, you know that right? He's not gonna pay them to implement something that doesn't improve game play what so ever, so you can stick boxes inside eachother to play little games, bud.
I think it may be to do with not breaking the system. It could cause like a feedback issue. After you put 100 boxes inside of each other there possibly could be a problem. I do not see it really used much anyway.
I mean you could use it to play that party game were you get a heavily wrapped present, form a circle, and one person opens open one layer and give it to the next person to open another layer and the last person gets the item.
But overall, it’s a pretty useless idea.
But overall, it’s a pretty useless idea.
This makes sense, thanks for being constructive ;)