Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Does data have mass? interesting

Started by Limpd [789073] on in Science.

6 replies · 146 views · thread synced · 9 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 7 / 7 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
7
Discussion span
→
People posting
6
Likes on archived posts
2
Authority score
7 / 100
Historical score
14 / 100
Story score
27 / 100
Engagement score
47 / 100
Sweeney_Todd [27468]
Well, data takes up space, whether it is written on paper or code, and this data needs to be stored somewhere, otherwise it is not data...

Hence, data has mass...
Thingy_R [567309]
Interesting topic indeed, bullshit reporting however..

Going into the actual research paper it just misrepresents the actual paper.
Happens a shitload in science reporting, the lost in translation to make it appealing for laymen.

Mike McRae is a part-time Journalist at ScienceAlert. He has been telling science stories in one form or another

That form looks like some fiction to me
Artsoppa [2242309]
The news report indeed is bs, but the original article is intetersting, even though theoretical physics is not my strongest area :)

But anyway, just to clarify some misconceptions, the data in this case means specifically digital data, not written or any other kind of information. And the reasoning behind the digitally stored data having mass is based on particle physics, quarks and other elementary particles, their intrisically contained information and what they emit and don't emit when they combine and so on.

So if you understand particle physics, go ahead and read the article. You will most likely understand more about it than I did :)

Here's the link for the original article: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0087175