Ummmm.... A ban on an anti competitive practice isn't communism, at all.
It's literally just a sensible capitalist policy, because anti competitive practices like price gouging, cartel behavior, and market allocation create undue cost-push inflationary pressures and are generally detrimental to economies for that reason.
You probably shouldn't talk about economic policy if you know nothing about economic policy.
Resurgence is currently recruiting new players who want to make good money warring and want to actively grow in the game. We offer the following perks, which are especially useful if you actively take Xanax to train your stats... Which if you don't, you should.
Toleration Addiction XV: Reduces drug addiction gain by 30% Overdosing III: Reduces risk of overdose by 9% Side Effects V: Reduces the side effects of drugs and increases addiction mitigation by 15%
Suppression Dexterity IV: Increases Dexterity passively by 4% Defense IV: Increases Defense passively by 4%
Free Xanax and Meds for war
We will be working on Steadfast as our next branch, so we're working towards having increased gym gains, increased base stats, and decreased risks from drug taking. In short; we're working on making it so you've got everything you need to get buff fast, and hopefully not have to worry so much about the consequences.
We enlist for war every week, and while we expect everyone to do their part; we also offer good payouts, and a considerable bonus for our standout performer in every 3 wars.
We have no stat requirements but you must login at least once every 2 days outside of war, and be as active as you can while warring. We also expect that by the start of wars, you are fully stacked to 1000 Energy with Xanax (which we provide as mentioned above) and that you make yourself unavailable for attacks from the enemy by self-hosping while you're not actively hitting (which we will teach you how to do if you don't know).
If you're a new player, or you're coming back to the game after a break, consider joining Resurgence; and get buff with us.
If you have any questions feel free to message me.
Until the US significantly reforms its political system to allow for proportional representation and removes the MANY barriers to third party candidates getting on ballots or debate stages, there is little point even discussing it.
The US has an entrenched 2 party system.
The more useful conversation, by far, is whether or not to move to a multi party, proportional system; and what reforms need to be made in order to achieve this.
The official position of the United States is that it acknowledges but does not endorse Beijing's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan.
While it officially acknowledges that claim, it would run counter to its stated position to move to any form of war footing over the issue of Taiwan, regardless of how China goes about solving said issue.
Furthermore, the Taiwan Relations Act authorizes only cultural, commercial and diplomatic relations with Taiwan, as well as committing the US to providing arms for Taiwan to defend itself (keyword: "Itself").
Most of these attempts were not carried out by anyone discernably left wing.
Also, during the time of Abe Lincoln, the Republican party was the left wing party as compared to the Democratic party.
The Democratic party, on the other hand, were right wing.
This didn't really change until the 1930s when Republican president Hoover declined to intervene after the Geeat Depression, whereas Democratic FDR did so, and became solidified in the 1960s when Barry Goldwater became the Republican nominee and ran on opposition to the Civil Right Act.
There are very rarely any good guys in these situations.
In this particular one, to consider either the US, Israel or Iran as the "good guys" is, as it is in almost any conflict between states, utterly delusional.