Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Run-Riot: forum

Run-Riot [1713552] Level 100 Natural Selection II NS Co-leader

Forum posts (Torn's count)
1,310 observed
Archived posts
1,161
Threads started (archived)
4

Boards

From the 1,161 newest archived posts.

Threads started

Most-liked posts

Likes as archived at fetch time, adjusted for how long each post had been up. Scored posts only; the full score pass runs after the import.

Cancelled trade suggestion · · 45 likes

Or you could just self hosp and turn revives off when dealing with amounts that you don't want to risk being mugged for.

Meme Fest: Bloodbath and Beyond · · 27 likes

This is actually sad to see.

Any B3 members who feel like being valued for working their butts off hit up one of our leads. I'm sure we can find a spot for you in one of our factions.

We even pay for your xanax/boosters/temps too!

Fedded Archives · · 72 likes

People getting perm'd for a racing script (which is also totally deserved btw) while others get off with a slap on the wrist for something that cheated a huge portion of the player base is actually wild.

!R! +10 Gym +9 Nerve +10 Items +Drugs Max · · 9 likes


up

!R! +10 Gym +9 Nerve +10 Items +Drugs Max · · 9 likes


up

Recent archived posts

Ranked War Matching and Ranks · · 1 like

Yea I have no problem with removing them member number rules on both ranks and matchmaking personally, though I do think there would need to some balancing tweaks with regards to target score. I think the target scores are too high for full factions and too low for smaller factions. 

 

I believe in with standardising the score target at ~10k lead in conjunction with removing the member number rules we could start too see where factions really stack up in terms of power.

 

But ultimately, yes, if faction X can beat faction Y in a ranked war I believe they should be higher ranked if they prove that in war. Factions should be able to construct their rosters however they want to as long as the drawbacks are balanced appropriately.

Ranked War Matching and Ranks · · 11 likes

Step in the right direction but Diamond should really only be the top 50 or so factions... and even that is pretty lenient if we're striving to make ranks actually means something.

Ranked War Matching and Ranks ·

What was the thinking in essentially removing deranks at diamond level if the goal was to make people less likely to term? Surely the logical step would have been to make losses more punishing?

[RW] NSII vs Just Fer Khaos · · 3 likes

Thanks for the fight, see you again in 6 weeks or so I guess!

[RW] NSII vs Just Fer Khaos · · 1 like

Glhf, should be interesting!

[RW] Just Fer Khaos vs Natural Selection IV · · 7 likes

[RW] Cata vs NS2 · · 6 likes

Short and sweet!

 

Appreciate the fun scrap guys, hopefully we get to run it back soon.

Arsenal F.C - EPL Champions 25/26 · · 6 likes

We fucking did it guys

 

Ranked War Matching and Ranks · · 5 likes

Not quite sure how this will increase the number of real wars tbh. If we're fighting the same 7-8 factions on a rotation, within a few months everyone will very quickly learn which wars are winnable and just ask for terms or rollover for the ones they can't win. 

 

On top of that, even if you could guarantee a competitive matchup every week, the vast majority of factions simply cannot afford to do that. We've had multiple wars that we've won and still been billions in the red. We're fortunate enough that we don't have any cash flow problems but it further incentivizes cache farming where outgoings are generally much lower.

 

I do think some changes to ranked warring in conjunction with this and we would be on the right track at least. Smaller target leads and making it more difficult to turtle your entire faction for 6 hours (make hosp times tick down at a greatly increased rate for those who are more than a couple of hours afk) would be good places to start.

[RW] Ratz v TNL - Real War · · 7 likes

Idk who started the offensive mercing but RWs are already a bad enough format, let's not make them even worse by devolving into that.

 

Looks like a sick war anyways!

Players, Are you watching? This is what Ched wants. · · 3 likes

Where suck ur mum mentos option?

Territory Overhaul Linking RWs ·

I'm all for changes with the territory warring system, despite my faction being one of those that benefits the most from the status quo, but can we please not to tie it to a broken RW system.

 

Territory wars are so much more enjoyable to fight - we need to be finding ways to incentivise movement by things such as map based bonuses and even tying rewards to the faction that received them if you wanted to get real extreme.

Nuke on Nuke? · · 24 likes

Petition to remove the merit from whoever dropped that for being an absolute pussy

Villain or hero · · 31 likes

Ridiculous this clown was given a platform to 'glorify' himself f**king people who trusted him over . Guy think's he's Lex Luthor or something when in reality all he did was sink as low as possible in this game.

 

 

Scumbags gonna scumbag I guess. Enjoy playing the game solo.

 

 

 

 

Fedded Archives · · 72 likes

People getting perm'd for a racing script (which is also totally deserved btw) while others get off with a slap on the wrist for something that cheated a huge portion of the player base is actually wild.

[RW] SA vs NSII · · 19 likes

Was a bunch of fun. Thanks SA for keeping it fast paced despite the fact you were struggling to push.

 

NS2 - Thanks for being awesome as always.

 

Until next time!

Dirty Bomb Buff · · 14 likes

Please please please let use these to blow a path through fakewall stalemates. It would make territory warring so much more fun.

 

Let factions pass through the irradiated territories just not stay on them.

Carbon vs NS2 · · 5 likes

Thanks for a fun fight guys, let's do it again sometime <3

Carbon vs NS2 · · 2 likes

Carbon vs NS2 · · 2 likes

Looking forward to this! GLHF :D