Thundergod: forum

Never thought I would see the day where GTA6 will be out before this challenge completes.

I sometimes count to make sure i get dealt 2 hole cards. Dealer at a casino has given me 1 a few times.

I'm personally a no only because it feels too shallow for my liking at 200bb. It might suit others though who like the action.

I'm sorry, but your 3rd video, the one with the KK hand is just poker terrorism. Also, if I'm piecing together the log correctly, you're still limping with pocket kings and limp reraising like it's 15 years ago? Forget the terrible postflop mistakes you made 300bb deep effective. You deserve to lose just based on you limping your pocket kings all the time.

I sometimes count to make sure i get dealt 2 hole cards. Dealer at a casino has given me 1 a few times.

$$ because I'm too dumb for BB and I also play more reckless if it's in BB

I'm sorry, but your 3rd video, the one with the KK hand is just poker terrorism. Also, if I'm piecing together the log correctly, you're still limping with pocket kings and limp reraising like it's 15 years ago? Forget the terrible postflop mistakes you made 300bb deep effective. You deserve to lose just based on you limping your pocket kings all the time.

Yep. Happened to me too. Was mugged for a good amount as I was thrown off by the change and of course it was the one time enemy's puncture hits past EOD and crits me for almost 10k for a 1 shot lol.

For the time being, if moving to stocks, bad blood bag and then refresh the stock page to update the money amount before medding out and depositing to stocks.

Besides playing way outside of your bankroll as mentioned before, why are you limping all your hands instead of raising, even limping pocket kings? Also why are you playing all these trash hands and even calling 5x raises with these hands when you are short stack, but are folding Kx offsuit hands. 

Sure in that 30 minute video i'll agree you had a cold deck(which is extremely common), but there's so much wrong with some of the decision making otherwise, that I wouldn't even worry if you were getting fed good hands or not.

It looks like you are playing 2010 poker or something rather than 2026 poker. There's a million good poker resources nowadays.

Do you play Torn Poker on computer? From the amount you type on your posts, it seems like you might play TP on your computer too. If so, let's start seeing some hand histories besides the one Teej had to dig up.

We'll get to see if you are really experiencing all these bad beats you claim. From the Teej hand and a couple pictures you posted once, chances are you are losing more money than you could in some of those hands and you're probably winning less than you could be winning in some hands.

Congrats

He's right. I believe you should share some of that 730b that Ched fed you.

Those hands have limited value without seeing the log/hand history(which is unfortunate can only be done in real time and usually only on pc), but a board pairing on the turn and a front door flush getting there on the river happens all the time.

I don't know what happened in the AA hand, but the in the K2s hand you don't even have a right to complain after you seemingly open limped with K2s and then decided to check on the flop when it limped through preflop.

If you are playing 63% of all hands, it seems like you're always playing hands like a5 to see the flop rather than it being an exception. And yea, the ones who are calling with more hands than you do are probably are not highly winning players, so I'm not sure why they are being referred to.

In any case, the reason you haven't passed 1.1b total cash could simply be that you haven't played enough. You posted that you have a winning record, so it could just be as simple as playing more hands. It seems to me you're trying to win too much too fast by playing with little to no bankroll management, given you think 1.3 bil is enough for cats chance. That will will come back to bite you sooner or later. Poker is a long term grind with a lot of wins, but a lot of losses too. You also seem to underestimate variance since it's easy to go down 2 full 200 buyins even on a table where you're a big winner.

There's also technical ability stuff, but you were posting winning numbers as it is, so I'll disregard that and just refer to the above comment.

Tbh, thread should've ended after Teej mentioned your 63% hands played, most of which I assume are on 9 handed tables or at least 6+ players. 63% hands on 9 handed tables is so massive you might as well be playing any 2 cards.

In the hand Teej brought up, he forgot to point out the fact that for some reason, you're calling an open from the small blind with A5o lol. 

Also, given the fact that you were playing Cats with like an 850m, chances are if by my stroke of luck someone gave you 500m and you turned it into 3b, you would try to take shots at High Rollers or something and lose most or all of it anyway.

Didn't know he got fedded, but yea he kept spending and playing poker tables that he really shouldn't have been on.

To be fair, most Torn Poker players are Torn players first and poker players second, certainly not studied players.

That being said, yea micro stakes-low stakes is a lot of bingo as it should be. No different than a lot of other fake money poker.

At least here though, the money eventually starts to mean something and some people will try to play seriously. Somewhere past Ballsy, a lot of the players aren't all that different from some live 1/3 players and online microstakes players at weak sites. There's a lot of similarities tbh and differences might be hidden a little bit because real money rake eats away at everyone's profits and makes people tighter too.

There's still weaker players at every stake, but yea the breakeven-winning regs play more seriously at Cats+ and certainly at HR+.

I unfortunately don't have any live 2/5 experience, but the winning HR+ players, probably even Cats+ are certainly a fair bit better than live 1/3 players. There's a lot of 1/3 players with just bad fundamentals lol.

Wow. Movie-style cooler. I'm used to the ak over 89 straights, but the ak over 89 straight flush is madness.

Buying Trains 15+ per day(Preferably Candle Shop or Restaurant)

Looking for very long term seller(Several thousand trains) | 15+ trains/day or as many that is possible

Prefer to rotate between all 3 stats at certain points.

MAN: 47,142

INT: 28,862

END: 48,670

Total: 124,674

EE10

Just coordinating a bunch of DBs during Halloween event would cause quite the stir.

I can confirm he is indeed a gambler. Just yesterday he joined the second highest poker table with about 1.5b, never seen him at that table before, and of course lost it all.

Have used it a little bit and it's pretty neat seeing how things change over time. Only thing to note I think is that it's not retroactive. You'll only see the changes once you install the script, not from before.

It's downplayed because the effects here are limited for the most part. Like said before, most people who might think about collusion are at lower stakes and aren't good enough to do anything with the info. And to my knowledge it's just not a thing at the higher stakes where there's real amounts of torn money being moved around and would be more of an incentive to collude.

Collusion in some PLO game with multiple knowledgeable players definitely has a huge affect, but knowing a buddy has a certain card is going to nothing for most of the playerbase who might try to collude here. Please tell us what effects of collusion you personally suspect in torn poker and at what stakes instead of some fairy tale hypothetical you keep mentioning.

You don't have to believe it if you don't want to, but it just is. This isn't Pokerstars or some other real money poker site. Also i'm pretty sure in your scenario, many more things would go wrong for the colluders instead of things right lol.

What exactly are 3 Ballsy players going to really accomplish colluding with each other when there's so many other holes in their game they need to tighten up first?