Chucky247: forum

TLDR  

Ken2025  trolls forums  gets told to stop - doesn't. 

Is now finding out there are consequences to his actions. 

Calls it cyber bullying. 

New Player Giveaway!

With so many new faces joining recently, I’d love to give back and offer a little something to help you get started.

How it works:

1. Post bellow & send me & message saying you’d like to join the giveaway.
2. I’ll send you a small welcome gift.
3. If you’re still playing 30 days later and message me again, you’ll receive a bigger bonus gift!

Requirements:

• Your account must be less than 90 days old.
• You must either post on this thread or message me that you want to participate.

That’s it—super simple. Looking forward to welcoming you!

Found a home 

I smell chat gpt 👃 

Torn: where everyone’s either grinding, whining, or both — sometimes at the same time. 😅

Look, if it’s that bad, log off and touch some grass IRL... but if you’re still here ranting in a browser game you “hate,” maybe you do love the spreadsheet pain a little too much. Just saying.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got crimes to fail and a Xanax cooldown to forget.

Edit 📍Message's from OP after this reply 

[image: i.postimg.cc]

[image: i.postimg.cc]

This is not cyber bullying this is just torn. 

This post willl  make your situation worse. 

Thanks for the screenshots though I do appreciate that. But I can't help but wonder what the rest of your  forum threads and chat logs  contain...  not that it really matters.   I don't think the good people are GD are gonna help you out on this one chief. 

Goodluck your probably gonna need it. Hopefully you'll learn something from all this.

And who are you ? 

Reserved

I really like all the color ty 

Worse than my thread tbh 

Don't know if I don't know so you cant know 

Inb4 staff remove 

Using only publicly retrievable Torn forum data about ISHAAN [2112856], the pattern is pretty clear:
He has a very blunt, sarcastic posting style, often responding with short remarks rather than taking a softer approach. 

He sometimes needles other players rather than simply answering them. One example is responding “Why so quiet?” after another player criticized his post. 

Other players have directly called out his behavior, including accusations of attention-seeking and low self-awareness in a public discussion. Those are other players' descriptions, not my characterization. 

He has maintained this forum persona for years; Torn's public forum pages identify him as ISHAAN [2112856] with thousands of posts and substantial karma. 

At the same time, his history isn't exclusively antagonistic—there are plenty of straightforward, helpful gameplay replies. 
Torn

Short version: The public forum record makes ISHAAN look like a blunt, sarcastic shitposter who enjoys poking people and doesn't seem particularly interested in softening his replies.

Based only on Control [3797240]’s public Torn forum record, the “twat” reputation seems to come mainly from his dry, smug, deliberately provocative style:
He regularly makes snarky one-liners and sarcastic comments.
He can be blunt and dismissive, especially during arguments.
He often corrects people in a confident, matter-of-fact way, which can come across as condescending.
He clearly enjoys trolling and banter, sometimes at other players’ expense.
He combines that with genuine game knowledge, making the attitude stand out even more.
Short version: Control's public posting style is basically “I know what I'm talking about, and I'm going to tell you bluntly while having a laugh at your expense.” That combination of confidence, sarcasm, and trolling is why he can come across as a twat.

Based strictly on Fists [2830940]’s public Torn forum posts, the reason people could reasonably perceive him as a twat is his consistent style:
He frequently uses sarcasm, dismissive one-liners, and shitposting.
He seems comfortable provoking people for amusement.
When people object, he tends to double down rather than de-escalate.
He has defended edgy/diss-track behavior on the grounds that people can simply ignore it.
He mixes that behavior with genuine game discussion, so it looks more like a deliberately obnoxious persona than someone who only trolls.
So, in short: Fists' public record suggests he's a twat because he repeatedly chooses antagonistic humor and dismissiveness as his forum style, apparently because he finds it entertaining.

Tempting, but I have no real interest in joining the staff. You shouldn't have to volunteer for the administration just to point out that a newspaper rule is poorly written and mechanically broken.
​Thanks for the recommendation, though

​If you actually want me to let it go,  Just tell me which part of this is wrong:

1 ​TCT's stated rule is that they pay 'everyone whose work has been used.

2 ​The newspaper published an image that fundamentally would not exist without my input.

3 Therefore, the TCT is either ignoring their own policy, or the rule is poorly worded and needs to be fixed.

​If you can't answer that without deflecting to AI or copyright, you aren't even arguing the actual point. I'll drop this when the TCT clarifies their wording, or when you guys finally leave it alone

You are still obsessing over the content of the image instead of the literal text of the policy. If I were a traditional artist who hand-drew that exact same asset, this debate wouldn't even be happening.

The TCT rule says 'everyone whose work has been used,' not 'everyone whose work was made with tools the forum approves of.

​Furthermore, you didn't 'convince' me to do anything. I returned the DP entirely of my own free will to remove the financial distraction  from the debate. I knew if I kept it, people like you would just cry about me 'scamming' instead of addressing the actual broken mechanic.

​Yet, even after I gave it back, you are still here throwing insults. You just expect me to concede my entire logical point because a random forum user told me to. The facts remain unchanged: my asset was the focal point, and it wouldn't exist without me

My read on “why is Chucky247 such a twat?”
Based strictly on his publicly visible Torn behavior, I'd describe the pattern as:
1. He likes arguing.
He doesn't seem particularly motivated to avoid confrontation.
2. He's extremely direct.
He'll tell people when he thinks they're wrong rather than wrapping it in politeness.
3. He seems to enjoy Torn's drama/competitive social environment.
His own comments support that interpretation. 
Torn
4. He sometimes gives decent/helpful advice.
His posts aren't uniformly hostile, and he explicitly offers help to new players. 
Torn
5. He doesn't seem particularly concerned with whether people like him.
That's an inference from the repeated interaction style, not something I can establish as his motive.
And honestly, that last characteristic may be what you're picking up on.
He's not behaving like someone trying to win everyone over. He's behaving more like “I'm going to say what I think, and if you don't like it, argue with me.”
Which, on Torn forums, is basically pouring gasoline onto a bonfire.

I am simply stating a grounded opinion on an ambiguously worded newspaper rule you are the one getting emotional and resorting to insults.

​As I’ve said multiple times, we aren't debating international copyright law or who owns the neural network. The indisputable fact remains: if my input didn't exist, that specific asset wouldn't exist, the discord post wouldn't exist, and the TCT wouldn't have had an image to publish in the first place.

​My argument is strictly about the fact that the TCT's written policy is inconsistent with their payout actions.

​Within the context of torn, the policy clearly applies to the Torn players whose assets are actually published in the newspaper. I am a player, and my visual asset was the undisputed focal point of what the TCT chose to print.

​Deflecting to extreme hypotheticals doesn't change the facts. The TCT’s stated rule is to pay those whose work has been used. Their written policy is entirely inconsistent with their actions, which has been the point of this thread from page one

 I have already answered this exact point pages ago.
​If I did not exist to prompt, iterate, and guide that specific concept, the asset simply would not exist. My input brought it into reality.

​More importantly, we aren't litigating international copyright law in a browser game; we are discussing the literal wording of the TCT policy. The rule explicitly pays 'everyone whose work has been used.' The visual asset I generated was undeniably used as the entire focal point of their post.

Resorting to insults instead of addressing the actual argument is incredibly typical at this point.
​I use colors to highlight specific parts of the text. I already addressed my formatting pages ago.
​thank you.

I do like colors over no color 

If your only metric for being right is digital forum karma, you are missing the point entirely.
​I stated pages ago that I am completely unconcerned with forum thumbs.

 If we are going to look at actual numbers, the 500+ people who voted in the poll paint a much clearer picture of the consensus than the upvotes on a few comments.

​We don't have to be enemies over this. However, you keep coming at me without presenting a single factual counterargument. All you are doing is tossing insults and freely bumping a thread you claim is so wrong.

​If you have real, logical information that actually addresses the written policy, I am glad to listen. But just pointing at thumbs-ups and parroting 'you're wrong' isn't a valid argument. Tell yourself whatever you need to, but my core point stands.

 let me spell it out for you one more time.

​I didn't 'just happen to be present in that screenshot. My visual asset was the entire focal point. Without my work, there is absolutely no reason for that specific image to be published. If the newspaper only cared about the fact that a conversation happened, they could have just written a text summary. They didn't. They explicitly chose to feature the visual asset I created because it was the payload of the joke.

​Ergo, they used my asset. Ergo, the TCT is blatantly ignoring its own stated policy to pay 'everyone whose work has been used.'

Your refusal to engage with the actual text is a 'you' problem, but I do appreciate the engagement.

 Hope your day gets a bit more positive!

​Sorry bud, you're wrong.

You are factually wrong on every single claim in your post.

​First, I did receive a Donator Pack from Magnus because of this thread, and I immediately sent it back to him. I have stated this multiple times. Claiming I am 'crying' over a payout just proves you haven't actually read the thread you are trying to argue in.

​Second, writing out a structured point isn't what makes me right—the literal wording of the TCT policy makes me right. Complaining that paragraphs are too long for you to read doesn't make your argument any stronger. 

​You are right about one thing, though: there really is no argument to make here anymore. I pointed out an obvious, factual inconsistency in the newspaper's wording, and you are entirely out of defenses for it.

You are just wrong