I've done a bit of math (could be wrong), and it seems like if we were always shoot twice (unless it was down to the 5th and 6th chamber obviously), then we lose 5/9 times.
Cherub012: forum
Cherub012 [2188314] Level 15
- Forum posts (Torn's count)
- 9 observed
- Archived posts
- 8
- Threads started (archived)
- 1
Boards
From the 8 newest archived posts.
- Gambling
- Trading Post
Threads started
Most-liked posts
Likes as archived at fetch time, adjusted for how long each post had been up. Scored posts only; the full score pass runs after the import.
I've done a bit of math (could be wrong), and it seems like if we were always shoot twice (unless it was down to the 5th and 6th chamber obviously), then we lose 5/9 times.
Recent archived posts
Safe and fair trades
Okay so I looked at the overall stats. This is a lot more complicated than I thought...
"Again assuming no double shooting"
I'm not making that assumption :P
I mean its profitable against players who shoot twice if they take the first shot.
If you want to make some money from R&R - just make sure you open the game and only take one shot. Every time your opponent shoots twice, you are making money. The worst that can happen is that you'll (theoretically) break even.
Yes youre right
If you think about it - the game is very profitable in the long run too
I will test this theory out and get back with some results (or not ;P)
Ok well despite the differences in the odds - the conclusion is the same :P
Hi Hows the challenge going?
I've done a bit of math (could be wrong), and it seems like if we were always shoot twice (unless it was down to the 5th and 6th chamber obviously), then we lose 5/9 times.