DeviJin: forum

Have you ever played a high amount of blackjack and lost? I guess so ...
and if I told you that with the last update the algorithm changes according to your bets?

let me explain better you have noticed that if you bet $ 1000 or $ 10,000 the winning percentage is greater than when you bet $ 100,000 onwards ($ 200,000 - $ 500,000 $ -1M $) because the system changes the algorithm and makes the bank has a higher score than yours or if you have 14 points in your hand the card you are going to get will get you off. The third option is that you will catch up with the dealer, but if you calculate the win percentage will always be lower than that bet $ 10,000 and show you an image to give you proof that what I'm writing is true.

[image: snag.gy]


a single image does not do a test but I realized this change a bit long ago and sent a message to the administrator and a developer to get an answer or a clarification but I didn't receive any reply.
if you think it is not enough try yourself by counting the winnings over $ 100,000 and the losses

[image: snag.gy]


[image: snag.gy]


I hope the staff will correct the algorithm or change the win / loss ratio for sums over $ 100,000

TherapyNeeded but what advice is it?
We are talking about an online game with virtual money we are not in las vegas to play with real money so what is the point in rigging the games.
if I have to hazard a hypothesis on whether to fix blackjack or other games it's just a matter of money because if the games were run with the right percentages the players of level below 10 or 20 by winning would have the chance to make money and buy weapons and armor as a level 30 or 40 and obviously the game would not be the same

Ecks [335191] unfortunately, as you can see, not everyone realizes it and not everyone understands, if a new thread has not been opened it means that nobody has thought "but how is it possible that if I bet a small figure I win even with 14 points and if point a figure 90% high the bank wins or draws "
as for the new revelations I have another one but this is better not to write it ....


Louis_de_Pointe [1963196] in practice and summary it works like you wrote but it is not right.

many computer program developers know that in order to create a casino game the so-called "do" must use a certain language, that is, do this, if a certain event happens, but when programming, "if-else" also exists means that the programmer can set up multiple blocks of instructions to be executed alternatively, whose execution is conditional on the fulfillment of certain preconditions.

• Akiha [2259797]

I looked at the screenshot you sent me and I found the same anomalies that I have rediscovered, that is if you look carefully you find something equal to my statistics. you played 14/15 small bets and you made 3 big bets of one you lost my stat


[image: snag.gy]
the small bets I won almost all of them I even won with 15 points those from $ 100000 I didn't win them because the bank always had 20 points or blackjack and to give you the proof that it's not about randomness I bet all the money that I always had the same amount of money or more. 5 games 4 lost and 1 won for a percentage of 90% of loss and 10% of winnings. winnings and losses

how many times have you lost and how many times have you won?
publish a screenshot of the plays

Have you ever played a high amount of blackjack and lost? I guess so ...
and if I told you that with the last update the algorithm changes according to your bets?

let me explain better you have noticed that if you bet $ 1000 or $ 10,000 the winning percentage is greater than when you bet $ 100,000 onwards ($ 200,000 - $ 500,000 $ -1M $) because the system changes the algorithm and makes the bank has a higher score than yours or if you have 14 points in your hand the card you are going to get will get you off. The third option is that you will catch up with the dealer, but if you calculate the win percentage will always be lower than that bet $ 10,000 and show you an image to give you proof that what I'm writing is true.

[image: snag.gy]


a single image does not do a test but I realized this change a bit long ago and sent a message to the administrator and a developer to get an answer or a clarification but I didn't receive any reply.
if you think it is not enough try yourself by counting the winnings over $ 100,000 and the losses

[image: snag.gy]


[image: snag.gy]


I hope the staff will correct the algorithm or change the win / loss ratio for sums over $ 100,000