Pezqueen: forum

Candle Shop

Current Openings: 1

Salary: 100k

Trains: Daily


Please send in an application! Thank you!

Company specials:

Warming Therapy: 1 job point +50 happiness

Illumination: Passive +50% awareness

Calming Therapy: 1 job point +2 nerve

Reinvigorating Therapy: 1 job point +5 energy

[background color=var(--bbc-body-bg-color)]Meditation: 250 job points View someone's true level
[/background]

Taking offers. Bonus 35%. No rush to sell, will wait for best offer.[image: cdn.discordapp.com]

Buying losses - 250k each

Hit and I'll send cash when I see the events.

If I am not online I will send cash as soon as I get back.

Who threatened legal action? I was just pointing out a few things as I was being ignored. There is no documentation or notice anywhere that these things run at different times. It is within reasonable expectation to assume everything is reset simultaneously until you run into this type of issue.

Thank you for the explanation as to why it happened. What are the plans to prevent it from happening in the future?

Do you think it is acceptable to award a prize and have it immediately removed? I can understand waiting until just before reset, spinning the wheel, winning tokens, and then the token reset nullifies them, but in this situation the system is not awarding the day's prize on the correct day.

My suggestion is to delay all casino reset actions to deploy simultaneously to ensure a prize is not immediately lost.

Edit: Ok... so we are just going to ignore me. Alright. Noted. Thanks.

Potential Legal Issues:

• Unfair Trading Practices (Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008): The game's design might be considered unfair if it leads consumers to believe they'll receive a prize for the current day, only to have it removed due to a timing discrepancy in the reset process.
• Breach of Contract (Consumer Rights Act 2015): If the terms and conditions don't clearly address this scenario, or if they imply a daily prize without exceptions, the game's actions could be seen as a breach of contract.
• Misrepresentation (Misrepresentation Act 1967): If the game advertises daily prizes without disclosing the potential for this reset issue, it could be considered misleading.

I'm so sorry I found a flaw in your logic. Silly me. I guess this is just another example of 'working as intended.'

Disappeared or never credited. I never saw them so I'm not convinced they existed at all.

But again, something like this shouldn't happen, thus bug report.

The casino resets at new day (wheels, tokens, casino streak, refill, etc.) If the reset had not happened, the wheel would not permit a spin. If the wheel did reset before the tokens, and the daily wheel prize was posted to the previous day rather than the current day, and then immediately removed, that would be a bug. Something not behaving as expected, and require investigation. You can't credit today's wheel prize to yesterday, that doesn't make sense no matter how you spin it.

If the wheel let me spin it already reset.

[image: cdn.discordapp.com]

Well, where are they?

Can I just ask, when was this changed? It used to say something like "You cannot use this item right now." which prevented multiple use of the item.

Um. Don't think this is supposed to happen. Used wrong blood bag from TT quick items, tested it from normal inventory and same thing happened. Used item, added med cd, and created a log entry each time. Maxed my med cd oopsies. sorry this report is a mess i need sleep

log

06:35:05 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:05 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:04 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:04 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:04 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:04 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:04 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:03 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:03 - 13/01/24	You were sent to the hospital for 1h 06m : Suffering from an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction
06:35:03 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 06m
06:35:03 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 02m
06:34:56 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 02m
06:34:56 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 02m
06:34:56 - 13/01/24	You were sent to the hospital for 1h 02m : Suffering from an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction
06:34:56 - 13/01/24	You used a Blood Bag : AB+ (wrong compatibility) going to the hospital for 1h 02m

I'm currently posting this with TornTools enabled.

10:22:01 - 18/12/23 You placed 1x $69,420 bounties on bogie for a cost of $104,130 : Blessings from the DUKE
10:24:06 - 18/12/23 You placed 1x $150,000 bounties on grandmodesty for a cost of $225,000 : Blessings from the DUKE
10:24:30 - 18/12/23 You placed 1x $100,000 bounties on DanTheMemeMan69 for a cost of $150,000 : Blessings from the DUKE
10:25:25 - 18/12/23 You placed 1x $150,000 bounties on TheNextLevel for a cost of $225,000 : Blessings from the DUKE
10:25:55 - 18/12/23 You placed 1x $150,000 bounties on Matcha for a cost of $225,000 : Blessings from the DUKE

690g

You're clearly an expert on the topic, aren't you?
[image: media.tenor.com]

I acknowledge your skill in evading recognition of any wrongdoing on your part or that of your faction. I also recognize that there are multiple perspectives to every story, and in this case, there are three sides: you have, at the most, part of one, while I am aware of at least the other two. I'm still puzzled by your insistence on intervening where your opinion was neither requested nor warranted.

This situation escalated far beyond what was necessary, and everyone involved shares responsibility. All he sought was a way to cope with the pain and betrayal inflicted by someone he had trusted. He simply requested that the situation be addressed one-on-one, without involving the rest of your faction.

While I understand that retaliating is a valid game mechanic, when someone makes such a straightforward request, why not consider conceding? Instead, it was met with not just indifference but further intensified retaliation. And then, when he mentioned that he would retaliate in response to your actions with other valid game mechanics, why did it lead to frustration?

It could have been as straightforward as allowing him the space to heal and move on. However, the situation was intentionally exacerbated. A faction member was sent to feign support and understanding, but this was a guise to gather information and coerce him into sharing things he might not have otherwise. This deliberate escalation persisted.

Many of you reached out to me, requesting that I relay messages to him, essentially circumventing a block. I explicitly expressed my reluctance to get involved. I asked that he not share his activities or the situation with me because, while I understood his reasoning, I didn't want to be part of it. However, you forced me into a position where I had to either deal with real-life issues or retaliate. When I chose the latter, you expressed frustration. The excessive response to a single in-game attack—retaliation along with four additional attacks—raises questions.

The worst part is that you started targeting my son, drawing him into the realm of adult drama. Yes, he plays to some extent; he's present. But that doesn't justify involving someone's child. This behavior paints a troubling picture of bullying. It took things too far, worsening an already delicate and precarious situation, and seemingly taking pleasure in doing so.

When I approached leadership and requested that my child be spared from the situation, I was informed that such behavior was not endorsed, and the involved parties were urged to cease their actions. Despite this, a few individuals persisted.

In addition to the issues I've already raised, it's essential to stress that deliberately provoking and antagonizing someone already in a fragile mental state constitutes harassment and bullying, leading to real-life distress. This may not fall under the Torn harassment definition, but it aligns with the real-world definition, which involves the deliberate act of provoking, intimidating, or antagonizing an individual, causing them emotional or psychological harm.

Understanding the gravity of these actions and the potential harm they can cause is crucial. What compounds the situation is that many of you were fully aware of the individual's delicate mental state yet persisted, exacerbating the real-life distress. Despite being informed several times about the repercussions in my real life, this still didn't deter you from continuing to engage in the situation.

Moreover, involving our child continued to add to this real-life distress since now our child questions what he did wrong to cause people he had not ever interacted with to begin bullying him.

What did you anticipate would be the outcome? Did you believe he would just back down when you all intervened? This was originally a personal, one-on-one situation, but it escalated when others got involved. Was it so difficult to allow someone to vent their pain and frustration within the context of a game that revolves around attacking other players? After enduring numerous retaliations from your group for attacks on a single person, it should come as no surprise that he eventually broadened his targets to include all those who were joining in. This isn't justification but an acknowledgment that relentless retaliation and provocation had a discernible impact on his in-game behavior. Keeping in mind all he asked was to keep this a one-on-one situation.

I encourage you to take a moment to reflect on whether it's truly worth jeopardizing someone's mental well-being for the sake of your own amusement.

I understand that you might not care, viewing him as just a random internet antagonist who needed to be put in his place. Personally, I approach everyone I encounter as a fellow human with emotions, making it challenging for me to comprehend the manner in which all of you behaved. Your unwavering commitment to protecting your faction member, irrespective of the circumstances, is disheartening.

You refused to stay out of it even though he simply sought a one-on-one with someone who had caused him real-life pain. Instead of allowing that, you orchestrated a situation to exploit his vulnerability, manipulated him into saying something, and immediately used it to get him fedded.

As a result, I will eventually have to leave the game as well, since continuing will only worsen real-life problems. So, thank you for resorting to bullying tactics. Because that's precisely what they were. Not a single ounce of sympathy or empathy was extended to someone who was struggling; instead, you felt compelled to demonstrate that he couldn't challenge TNL. I hope that none of you find yourselves in situations where you need sympathy or empathy from strangers because your conduct in this instance was abysmal. Remember, the energy you put into the universe has a way of coming back to you.

You overdosed on some Ecstasy losing 1,000 energy and 99,999 happiness.

I also did not notice any errors or anything out of the ordinary other than the 5e used for the wall swap. Could have been during lag, but I don't remember.

[image: cdn.discordapp.com]
Same thing happened here. Any update?

07:30:06 - 26/12/22 You sent 1x Present to pezking33 with the message: For tonight ;-)

Present - Feathery Hotel Coupon, Feathery Hotel Coupon, Erotic DVD, Box of Tissues.