refunds. This is a fast paced lottery intended to do a drawing at least once a day.
The premise is simple...
Send me one Xanax or up to two to be entered.You are entitled to 1 entry for xan you send. More than 2 per draw per person is forbidden. You will recieve credit for future draws if you send more than 2. Once I receive 11 Xanax I will enter those 11 entrys into this Random Picker and send those ten Xanax to the winner. And for the sake of transparency, I'll keep the 11th Xanax to keep this going. The winner is also entitled to 1 classified ad,1 banner ad(max duration 3 days) and if he so wishes one proxy personal ad.All to be placed by me on his behalf.
When you enter, please comment on this thread so I can keep track of your name to input into the picker.
Why am I doing this? Cause I saw pickle slinger's idea and decided to 3 up him and blatantly steal it like I stole the idea to sell over price item's in bazaar for stock block donations from some other guy. Get over yourself nothing is original anymore.
Winners so far: Lottery 1 draw: harshbansal902 Lottery 2 draw: Cokefan Lottery 3 draw: Goldly33 Lottery 4 draw: PredatorRaWr Lottery 5 draw: WolfJunk Lottery 6 draw: Goldy33 Lottery 7 draw: MrFamJams Lottery 8 draw: Goldy33(this is starting to get repetitive) Lottery 9 draw: Goldy33 (come the f**k on...) Lottery 10 draw: Goldy 33(He has temporarily stopped playing cause like come on) Lottery 11 draw: WolfJunk Lottery 12 draw: KatyPrata Lottery 13 draw: Sashins Lottery 14 draw: Goldy33 Lottery 15 draw: hamburgerthief Lottery 16 draw: NPC3 Lottery 17 draw: Tani wa Lottery 18 draw: NOT DETERMINED DUE TO INDEFINITE SUSPENSION OF LOTTERY. REFUNDS BEING ISSUED. Changes: People can now paritcipate for up to 2 chances individually per draw. As per the result of the voting: https://www.torn.com/forums.php#/p=threads&f=13&t=16193270&b=0&a=0&start=0&to=20926265 Does this upset you? You think it should be allowed more than 2 per person tops? Or only one? Plz let me know comment here and make your friends comment about it. Anybody having participated at least 1 time will be taken into account for a possible re vote to change rules. However I will not offerr a revote if I don't see popular demand for it. So far the people have spoken and overwhelmingly voted for up to 2 participations a man.
Also pd: Regarding the discrimination 3 day ban cause I hadn't adressed it previously I find that to be a clearly show of intentional enforcement against me likely by the person who reported me by having contacts in stafff..reason being I made it clear I was using said words cause he threatened me not to and still got 3 day of forum ban as if I had targeted anyone. He can be blue for all i care. He is stil a piece of shit.
Being able to control your cooldown better is literally what I said...you have less rounds so you make sure to make them count.. So you are proving me right
No. The boost is around double power and the power of the cap specially with the old cap being 48 is being able to run up to the limit and exceed it. Some guy in this threat seriously said the fact you could go less over the bar was a benefit...
You can compare anything to anything....I forgot to add each shot is more powerfull by around 50 percent and actually your original magazine held 20 rounds.
2 anecdotal cases makes my whole idea unfounded...yeha that is how evidence and rationale works...if you had actually seeing the trade chat after this changes you would know people where asking for 2 xan a rev...and yes revs have lower value because of failure chance....If you read wtf I started my post with...by saying it was economical nonsence to hike price on an items that has a lesser value then you would know I didn't pose 2 ideas...I posed the same idea...but observed market trend on the hand of revivers and market trends on the hands of consumer leading me to postulate that 2 xan could become the new standar since people are skipping on paying failed revives...but ok bro strawman me,missrepresent me...argue with a teddy bear if you want... ain't gonan make my idea unfounded.