Brooke_Mirova: forum

A friend of mine, Pev_Pierce [3043338]  was accused of being a multi of Moe_Black [2366950]. She joined around the same time as me and has played for almost 

Last week, both were fedded and accused of being multis. The staff had accused them of "feeding" i.e transferring networth to one another. They highlighted the ups and downs of Moe_Black [2366950]'s networth as proof.

Moe and Pev are traders and share a PI, with Moe often purchasing flowers for delayed payment from Pev. Hence, the shifts in networth.

Yet, despite explaining this and providing evidence, the staff were adamant that they were multis. They gad attacked each oyher simultaneously, showed their internet connections, and yet the staff said it wasnt adequate evidence.

At first, they kept asking Moe what he thought he was guilty of. Not providing any specific reason for why he was accused of being a multi. The staff then finally asked him about the "feeding", and did the same for Pev too. Whats worse? This was in the appeal reply:

"Again playing on the same wifi, attacking each other, etc is no proof for us here. There is way more and you know about it.

Can you explain the feeding?

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 1:10:03 PM by Torn City Staff

is it the flowers? or xanax? i remember last time giving moe all the xanax i bought from SA. moe is asking my help to buy it for him. if its flowers? i used to give him all the flowers i bought abroad so moe can exchange it with points, and share it with me. through the faction vault.

we do agree on sharing our funds in our property vault.

is this the feeding that you meant?

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 1:39:09 PM by Pev_Pierce [3043338]

Our proof is not ingame behaviour, really.

But also it doesnt seem you are sharing cos all money goes to Pierce.

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 1:51:18 PM by Torn City Staff

well, i do beg to differ on that. because i dont think im richer than moe

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 2:08:20 PM by Pev_Pierce [3043338]"

"There is way more and you know about it."

"All the money goes to Pierce"

Yall see this?

This isnt an appeal, its an outright, biased dismissal.

Insisting theres more despite evidence against being a multi.

Accusing Pev of being Moe, even saying "Pierce" instead of "you" when replying to Pev.

Now? Even after appealing and explaining, staff decided to close the case and fed Pevs account entirely. 

So, because two people share a vault and trade flowers, they were vaulted.

Because of some overzealous, biased staff members, evidence was not properly considered, reason for penalties were not adequately explained, and a friend of mine has been fedded wrongly.

Its appalling how wrong this is, and its upsetting that those who are supposed to be impartial handled a case so incompetently. I sincerely hope this case can be reinvestigated properly, id hate to lose a friend.

I dont care if the staff come after me. I dont care if i get flak for this. I will not stand by idly while my friends are unjustly punished for a crime she didnt commit. And if yall are still gonna be power tripping slugs on a throne of shit? f**k you and your authority.

Thanka for the rev!

I shall do that, hope it works

Context:

Pev was in our sister faction as a coleader at the time, but she was in our discord.

Some dude named pavemented mugged our lower member, so we retalled.

After the truce, pev didnt get the memo and attacked.

Dude had a melt down and reported them cause they "attacked together a lot"

[image: profileimages.torn.com]

[image: profileimages.torn.com]

I wont expect much. Not anymore.

This all started cause some dude had a meltdown over being attacked by Pev and Moe a lot as retal for mugging our lower faction members.

Im taking this in my own hands are irradiating him to Chernobyl and back. If he wants to cry, he can go cry ti the staff he loves so much.

A friend of mine, Pev_Pierce [3043338]  was accused of being a multi of Moe_Black [2366950]. She joined around the same time as me and has played for almost 

Last week, both were fedded and accused of being multis. The staff had accused them of "feeding" i.e transferring networth to one another. They highlighted the ups and downs of Moe_Black [2366950]'s networth as proof.

Moe and Pev are traders and share a PI, with Moe often purchasing flowers for delayed payment from Pev. Hence, the shifts in networth.

Yet, despite explaining this and providing evidence, the staff were adamant that they were multis. They gad attacked each oyher simultaneously, showed their internet connections, and yet the staff said it wasnt adequate evidence.

At first, they kept asking Moe what he thought he was guilty of. Not providing any specific reason for why he was accused of being a multi. The staff then finally asked him about the "feeding", and did the same for Pev too. Whats worse? This was in the appeal reply:

"Again playing on the same wifi, attacking each other, etc is no proof for us here. There is way more and you know about it.

Can you explain the feeding?

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 1:10:03 PM by Torn City Staff

is it the flowers? or xanax? i remember last time giving moe all the xanax i bought from SA. moe is asking my help to buy it for him. if its flowers? i used to give him all the flowers i bought abroad so moe can exchange it with points, and share it with me. through the faction vault.

we do agree on sharing our funds in our property vault.

is this the feeding that you meant?

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 1:39:09 PM by Pev_Pierce [3043338]

Our proof is not ingame behaviour, really.

But also it doesnt seem you are sharing cos all money goes to Pierce.

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 1:51:18 PM by Torn City Staff

well, i do beg to differ on that. because i dont think im richer than moe

Replied to on 29/07/25 at 2:08:20 PM by Pev_Pierce [3043338]"

"There is way more and you know about it."

"All the money goes to Pierce"

Yall see this?

This isnt an appeal, its an outright, biased dismissal.

Insisting theres more despite evidence against being a multi.

Accusing Pev of being Moe, even saying "Pierce" instead of "you" when replying to Pev.

Now? Even after appealing and explaining, staff decided to close the case and fed Pevs account entirely. 

So, because two people share a vault and trade flowers, they were vaulted.

Because of some overzealous, biased staff members, evidence was not properly considered, reason for penalties were not adequately explained, and a friend of mine has been fedded wrongly.

Its appalling how wrong this is, and its upsetting that those who are supposed to be impartial handled a case so incompetently. I sincerely hope this case can be reinvestigated properly, id hate to lose a friend.

I dont care if the staff come after me. I dont care if i get flak for this. I will not stand by idly while my friends are unjustly punished for a crime she didnt commit. And if yall are still gonna be power tripping slugs on a throne of shit? f**k you and your authority.

What hes neglected to say is that hes stopped training at below 700m stats, hence why hes been outstatted. Now Max is throwing a hissy fit cause one of his former bully targets us stronger than em now.

Can vouch for, my goto plushie dealer