I want to get my oldest log entries and after that iterate to the current date so i have all my logs to analyze. And later update them with new entries.
If i add the to field i can get it to filter records. But that for me feels inefficient as i won't know if i am missing entries if i guess a date/time to fetch to without having overlap that is a waste of resources.
If someone can shine some light on it i would appreciate it a lot. I think the same goes for faction logs etc.
When i created my account i was in the impression gave the referral to my friend Pjotter[66015] who told me about the game. As i have passed level 15 i would expect that he would receive a reward but he haven't. I may have used the wrong pjotter, i may have used pjotter79[2243908]. Could this be checked/changed?
That one does it like described above. I would like to do it in less API calls.
I think if only the from parameter is given (no to parameter) it should supply the next 100 log entries from the value of the from argument. (Or less if it is at the end).
That would make more sense. And should not break any existing calls for as far as i can see.
I want to get my oldest log entries and after that iterate to the current date so i have all my logs to analyze. And later update them with new entries.
If i add the to field i can get it to filter records. But that for me feels inefficient as i won't know if i am missing entries if i guess a date/time to fetch to without having overlap that is a waste of resources.
If someone can shine some light on it i would appreciate it a lot. I think the same goes for faction logs etc.
When i created my account i was in the impression gave the referral to my friend Pjotter[66015] who told me about the game. As i have passed level 15 i would expect that he would receive a reward but he haven't. I may have used the wrong pjotter, i may have used pjotter79[2243908]. Could this be checked/changed?
3128