Courtz9488: forum

I decided to do a physics degree because of how heavily I believe our universe is in a black hole and as such millions of others too its actually a well discussed theory in physics called Loop Quantum Gravity they haven't been able to disprove it yet and a lot of the maths adds up especially the great attractor phenomena which I have suspicions is just the singularity. Hopefully revisit the topic when im further into my degree but I agree your onto something with your theory. But to be completely non-bias hawking radiation suggests they just shoot energy back out and sort of evaporate.

I think you might’ve missed the tone and caveats of my original comment this was just a fun speculative belief, not me trying to state the be-all and end-all facts of the universe. I literally said it’s something I’ll revisit later into my degree and even acknowledged Hawking radiation as a counterpoint.

That said, the LQG bounce absolutely does have implications for black hole cosmology that’s part of the modern LQG literature, so saying they’re “not related” is just flat-out incorrect.

And yeah, string theory has incredibly pretty maths and recovers Einstein’s GR, I won’t argue that but that doesn’t automatically make it more convincing in a physical or empirical sense.

I’m not trying to draft a full hypothesis on a Torn forum though this was just a light speculative comment, so I’ll leave it here.

I decided to do a physics degree because of how heavily I believe our universe is in a black hole and as such millions of others too its actually a well discussed theory in physics called Loop Quantum Gravity they haven't been able to disprove it yet and a lot of the maths adds up especially the great attractor phenomena which I have suspicions is just the singularity. Hopefully revisit the topic when im further into my degree but I agree your onto something with your theory. But to be completely non-bias hawking radiation suggests they just shoot energy back out and sort of evaporate.