Haha wow, what a backlash. Seems like my reserved approach was my undoing. Although i still think in a game such as this that explanations in how you make assumptions undermines a persons reasoning (wolves know what to look out for not only in current game but future games), I will tell you anyway...
Per phophets breakdown...
Page 3 (day 1) - Killerdan was a bandwagon vote to understand who was doing what (I needed a scapegoat people would get behind). From this we could clearly see the groupings (bandwagons and people who were throwing retarded votes).
Don, destroys, me, mr mang, ask and hakuna all voted killerdan.
Of us only mr.mangelli and hakuna are alive. I consider them low probability.
Six voted for me for my sudden bandwagon on killerdan. I also consider him low probability.
Note that CatHead, killerdan and BigEasy voted Destroys day 1 and merocks did a random vote.
Also note that prophet picked merocks day 1
Page 12 (day2) Voted BraveKath. There were 2 player groups I needed to evaluate. One that had targeted pinkie and the other which was targeting bigeasy.
LordSam and bravekath voted for pinkie day 1.
Merocks and prophet (who voted merocks week 1..) both voted for bigeasy day 2.
Lordsam and bigeasy voted for destroys.
Anyway I cant be bothered to write everything but this last vote was based off the fact that prophet was flipping off and on pinkiepie and I needed to remove the variable.
Vote off prophet then vote off pinkie. Or vice versa then follow the trail.
Haha wow, what a backlash. Seems like my reserved approach was my undoing. Although i still think in a game such as this that explanations in how you make assumptions undermines a persons reasoning (wolves know what to look out for not only in current game but future games), I will tell you anyway...
Per phophets breakdown...
Page 3 (day 1) - Killerdan was a bandwagon vote to understand who was doing what (I needed a scapegoat people would get behind). From this we could clearly see the groupings (bandwagons and people who were throwing retarded votes).
Don, destroys, me, mr mang, ask and hakuna all voted killerdan.
Of us only mr.mangelli and hakuna are alive. I consider them low probability.
Six voted for me for my sudden bandwagon on killerdan. I also consider him low probability.
Note that CatHead, killerdan and BigEasy voted Destroys day 1 and merocks did a random vote.
Also note that prophet picked merocks day 1
Page 12 (day2) Voted BraveKath. There were 2 player groups I needed to evaluate. One that had targeted pinkie and the other which was targeting bigeasy.
LordSam and bravekath voted for pinkie day 1.
Merocks and prophet (who voted merocks week 1..) both voted for bigeasy day 2.
Lordsam and bigeasy voted for destroys.
Anyway I cant be bothered to write everything but this last vote was based off the fact that prophet was flipping off and on pinkiepie and I needed to remove the variable.
Vote off prophet then vote off pinkie. Or vice versa then follow the trail.
Haha wow, what a backlash. Seems like my reserved approach was my undoing. Although i still think in a game such as this that explanations in how you make assumptions undermines a persons reasoning (wolves know what to look out for not only in current game but future games), I will tell you anyway...
Per phophets breakdown...
Page 3 (day 1) - Killerdan was a bandwagon vote to understand who was doing what (I needed a scapegoat people would get behind). From this we could clearly see the groupings (bandwagons and people who were throwing retarded votes).
Don, destroys, me, mr mang, ask and hakuna all voted killerdan.
Of us only mr.mangelli and hakuna are alive. I consider them low probability.
Six voted for me for my sudden bandwagon on killerdan. I also consider him low probability.
Note that CatHead, killerdan and BigEasy voted Destroys day 1 and merocks did a random vote.
Also note that prophet picked merocks day 1
Page 12 (day2) Voted BraveKath. There were 2 player groups I needed to evaluate. One that had targeted pinkie and the other which was targeting bigeasy.
LordSam and bravekath voted for pinkie day 1.
Merocks and prophet (who voted merocks week 1..) both voted for bigeasy day 2.
Lordsam and bigeasy voted for destroys.
Anyway I cant be bothered to write everything but this last vote was based off the fact that prophet was flipping off and on pinkiepie and I needed to remove the variable.
Vote off prophet then vote off pinkie. Or vice versa then follow the trail.
Haha wow, what a backlash. Seems like my reserved approach was my undoing. Although i still think in a game such as this that explanations in how you make assumptions undermines a persons reasoning (wolves know what to look out for not only in current game but future games), I will tell you anyway...
Per phophets breakdown...
Page 3 (day 1) - Killerdan was a bandwagon vote to understand who was doing what (I needed a scapegoat people would get behind). From this we could clearly see the groupings (bandwagons and people who were throwing retarded votes).
Don, destroys, me, mr mang, ask and hakuna all voted killerdan.
Of us only mr.mangelli and hakuna are alive. I consider them low probability.
Six voted for me for my sudden bandwagon on killerdan. I also consider him low probability.
Note that CatHead, killerdan and BigEasy voted Destroys day 1 and merocks did a random vote.
Also note that prophet picked merocks day 1
Page 12 (day2) Voted BraveKath. There were 2 player groups I needed to evaluate. One that had targeted pinkie and the other which was targeting bigeasy.
LordSam and bravekath voted for pinkie day 1.
Merocks and prophet (who voted merocks week 1..) both voted for bigeasy day 2.
Lordsam and bigeasy voted for destroys.
Anyway I cant be bothered to write everything but this last vote was based off the fact that prophet was flipping off and on pinkiepie and I needed to remove the variable.
Vote off prophet then vote off pinkie. Or vice versa then follow the trail.
![[image: m.popkey.co]](https://m.popkey.co/a53cd7/aWZjk.gif){kind=link}