If you think you have that star quality or perhaps would prefer a supporting role earning anywhere from 600k-1.5m Daily apply today or mail DaveO for more information.
This is a new project and TV network bought to you by Torn between two Animals Anonymous
Jinx [130987] - most creative - Strife Clown You sent your Strife Clown to Jinx with the message: Congratulations! Your entry was chosen the most creative in the Halloween Costume contest!!
Flum [1024939] -funniest - Cesium-137 You sent your Cesium-137 to Flum with the message: Congratulations! Your entry was chosen the funniest in the Halloween Costume contest!!
2sox [1754817] -scariest - Cesium-137 You sent your Cesium-137 to 2sox with the message: Congratulations! Your entry was chosen the scariest in the Halloween Costume contest!!
Prizes have been sent thankyou to everyone who entered.
If you don’t argue with yourself how do you see the other side? But yes 100% arguing out of the principal of some undefined rule should be in the rules 🤷♂️
Merely questioning statements being made by staff about things that will get you sent to fed that aren’t technically in the rules that other rules are being used for that aren’t fit for purpose.
Personally it is not anything I am involved in just seems very wishy washy and I believe when it comes to fed sentences it should be black and white.
But my point still stands this is not in the ToS. So technically it isn’t against the rules and would be staff pulling rules from thin air unless they update the ToS.
Also this is almost worth restarting for just to troll when and if it is officially a rule 🤣
So then the rules need to be updated to define the change from one person having multiple accounts to multiple people having accounts to benefit one account.