Avoid purchasing. Already has a faction member that will buy it - user sets up trade only to mug you before you initiate.
Silje: forum
Silje [970946] Level 99
- Forum posts (Torn's count)
- 253 observed
- Archived posts
- 109
- Threads started (archived)
- 5
Boards
From the 109 newest archived posts.
- Company Recruitment
- General Discussion
- Faction Discussion
- Company Discussion
- Achievements
- Suggestions
- Trading Post
- Graveyard
Threads started
- 6* Mining Company Hiring - 2-4m
- TV Network Hiring - 3-4.5m per day!!!
- 7* Oil Rig - Hiring 1m per day.
- 10* Ladies Strip Club - Hiring!
- 2* Ladies Strip Club Hiring
Most-liked posts
Likes as archived at fetch time, adjusted for how long each post had been up. Scored posts only; the full score pass runs after the import.
Avoid purchasing. Already has a faction member that will buy it - user sets up trade only to mug you before you initiate.
Found*
Bump
I currently have one position open for my TV Network (TVP - 9*). Please apply and I will pay you accordingly (3-4.5m depending on your stats). I am looking for active users (log on multiple times a day) - drug use is okay as long as you rehab regularly.
Apply now!
^^
Recent archived posts
Found
I've been Sage for the longest time... Now I'm known as a Booster... Not sure what thah means lol
The part you are missing from this quote continues as follows: "... And it will be the same thing as it has always been."
Essentially, what I am getting at is it matters very little what faction name one has, or who sits where in a time of neutrality and development. When a war comes around it is all fluid and there will always be a flux of members coming and going to meet the various competing needs of a faction or alliance.
Hence, why I said it's all meaningless and wished said partners the best.
It's not a complaint, merely an observation. I don't think that roster locking is the solution either, but that's an entire other discussion.
Essentially, what I am getting at is it matters very little what faction name one has, or who sits where in a time of neutrality and development. When a war comes around it is all fluid and there will always be a flux of members coming and going to meet the various competing needs of a faction or alliance.
Hence, why I said it's all meaningless and wished said partners the best.
It's not a complaint, merely an observation. I don't think that roster locking is the solution either, but that's an entire other discussion.
What I find hilarious deft, is that in no way shape or form did I ever air any concern over members rotating, and yet you went through all this trivial research to prove what exactly?
I know my reading comprehension isn't great, but how did you ever come to this conclusion based on what I wrote?
I know my reading comprehension isn't great, but how did you ever come to this conclusion based on what I wrote?
Guesting, 1m per hit, wall sitting for free.
Message me :)
Message me :)
It's all semantics if you really think about it. Bottom line is all of these factions are allied and when the time comes the rosters will change to reflect that and it will be the same thing as it has always been. It's all circular and it quite meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
Best of luck anyways!
Best of luck anyways!
TIL: I'll never get on this list :P
Thanks for all the hard work Proxima!
Thanks for all the hard work Proxima!
Someone browses Reddit...
R+
Definitely needs some more work to it. For instance, what about the Pharmacy we find in the East Side? How would this company interact with this? Perhaps, there could be a way to use job points to get serotonin, epinephrine, etc. instead of drugs... Just some food for thought :)
I don't see how this function would balance anything to be fair. The whole premise of a raid is to do so against an enemy who you know you will defeat and/or want to destroy. Nothing would stop an aggressor from stacking their roaster before initiating a raid, which only puts those being raided on at a disadvantage following such a suggestion.
I like the suggestion made by Green_Revolver, where a faction needs to maintain a minimum of X members in the faction while being raided, but to try to control who this faction chooses to have defend it is trivial.
I like the suggestion made by Green_Revolver, where a faction needs to maintain a minimum of X members in the faction while being raided, but to try to control who this faction chooses to have defend it is trivial.
The only stale thing I gather from all of this is: all involved parties pointing fingers at one another trying to justify to what degree one is more "right" or "wrong".
The trivial thing in all of this is that no side will agree equally... I ask you this then, what is the point? What do you hope to gain from all of this?
*grabs more popcorn*
The trivial thing in all of this is that no side will agree equally... I ask you this then, what is the point? What do you hope to gain from all of this?
*grabs more popcorn*
A large portion of my in-game development took place in HT-, at a time where knowing some Norwegian had some sway ;) I wish you all the best in bringing some life back into HT- and I am glad to see some familiar faces within its ranks.
Is i magen!
Is i magen!
The predicament I found myself in was related to the particular special gym I found myself in. I suppose it was more of an excuse to neglect other stats, while enjoying the added benefits of the gym I found myself in. Needless to say, the system needs some fine tuning and it Will inevitably always be the case!
It's great to have a discussion about this.
It's great to have a discussion about this.
Guest chainer, mail me.
Poland
This thread delivers!
Congratulations, and I wish you nothing but the best in this endeavour!
Silje
Yawns...
Always looking for some excitement! Mail me about your upcoming war(s)!