SA vs JFK

I dont give a shit about terms guests etc but yall need to stop going on about massive stat disadvantage cause we all know thats a load of shite.

Hopefully its just a good old slugfest once it gets going.

i will set my alarm for this ,


so as i know when and why torn crashes with lag...




regards the emphasis on difference in stats ??
bullcrap , it will fall down to how both sides chain and who uses their heads best that will win, out statted means shit tbh, SA have members who can sit on the top hitters of JFK , so do so , let all others fill chains .

then it comes down to further tactics to see who comes out on top, anyone smart enough will deploy tactics ( not talking dirty here either btw ) to make sure they get the best out of what they got.

if either side has a good tactician then they hold the advantage

Completely disagree with that.

As a lot of you know, FTW war, war hard and war everybody. We have wars where we are massively outstated and it does make a massive difference.
We have lost plenty of wars because of it. And I mean PLENTY.

Despite what my quoted post says and what fanboys say, stats do make a massive difference in wars.
There is only so long you can wait in hosp whilst the opposition pounds away at you. Eventually it is too long if they have way too many to deal with.
Players like BodyBagger, DrGonzo, Z and nota do make a big difference, but only for as long as their energy lasts.
Take them out and then you are left with hardcore stats v stats.
JFK still win that battle. Tactics and skill can only take it so far. Those with the most players that can sit on the enemy will come out the winner.

This war will come down to stamina. Who can stay online the longest to churn those chains out whilst the untouchable beasts are awol.
Stick 3 guests in 50b+ and JFK still have the advantage if they are active enough.
Will be a really close war. I can't wait.

Ok, lets close the stat debate. It's silly that a faction with highest statted player in Torn and a self-proclaimed legend who single handedly owns entire JFK on daily basis talks about being in disadvantage.

This is just another in a long line of wars, albeit with pretty bad timing for us, but we never said no to a challenge and we won't start now either. We're going to have fun and do the best we can as we always do, get our oldies ready and prepare the proper outfits for this war, something along the lines of this...

[image: s21.postimg.org]

1070 is the only legend i know m8
P.S. nice to know Z uses snapchat

Stick 3 guests in 50b+ and JFK still have the advantage if they are active enough.


lol

paz so having major stats is an advantage but not an advantage lol

good tactics and stamina will win a war , even the untouchables can only use so much energy and do so many hits .

yeah sure those untouchables can make life as difficult as hell for sure , but they alone cant win a war on their own...

so plan , be tactical , use good use of what you have...

Do you spend your time collecting these images when you are not chaining? I'm impressed

SA are indeed significantly beaten in stats if you consider number and not collective stat and in this current war system, numbers matter a lot. Lets say everyone in JFK and SA are stacked to 1k e which rounds up to 40 attacks and both factions have 100 members. SA has 2[potentially 5, bringing it to 5% members] members over 10b and JFK has 16[16% members].

.

These 21 members can keep the rest under them in hospital quite easily. So considering these members, SA has a collective attack capability of 200 hits to keep 94% of JFK in hospital easily[if 10b can be easily taken down by 20b members] but JFK has a collective attack capability of 640[over 300% of SA] hits and they can keep down 95% of SA members in hospital with relative ease. This gives JFK a massive edge in the war in terms of energy to keep the onliners of SA in hospital and break their chaining while top SA members are fairly limited in that area. So anyone saying 'takticks op, stats overrated' should think again. One of the main reason JFK have succeeded and overpowered every single faction is due to having so many high stat members.

actually ,

you will find that tactics are fundamental , big hitting members can only make so many hits , once they used theor stacks an boosters are maxed they are no longer as much use , until they can regen an boosters cooldown.

in wars its not the big generals that do the most work its the the lower levels , with out the runners or in terms of torn the chain fillers , then wars cant be won.

so yes tactics are fundamental , yes big stats will play its part of course they will would be stupid to say they wont. but to say its all down to big hitters is nonsense.

i was kept in hospital for pretty much 95% of the time FTW were involved in the 7 way war, did that mean i didnt contribute or was useless ?

far from it , i did things that nobody could stop me from doing despite being in hospital and then towards the end of our wars i came out to have a play on the war field itself and still managed despite having crap stats to make nearly 20 hosps....

Best of luck to SA +3 - This should be a good one.

dude... did you have to steal my pics... i know im old but damn

Stats matter. With that you have flexibility to choose strategy.

You guys shouldn't be fussing over stats so much, it's more of how SA will use BB to shit on jfk when there top hitters are online and chaining, he should be retal hunting and hosping tonnes of nubs whilst the rest of SA are smashing out the 100's.

Rooting for SA on this one just because I don't wanna see jfk ranked number 1 for any longer - no hate [:sick:]

I'm confused why there's all these debates about who is in advantage or disadvantage.
If a faction has higher statted players (or whatever the case may be) then that is what they built up over the years.
It is a part of what makes them the faction they are. Why should all wars be cushioned to be "fair" and "even" if you're trying to prove your strength/match up? Doesn't that spoil the whole purpose?

Play with what you have and if you end up on top then kudos. You proved a point and probably earned it.


on another note.. Go JFK! >:)

I kind of agree with you. By saying JFK has an advantage or has not doesn´t take anything away from them if they win. But, JFK are super strong, wealthy and well organised. And ofc no war can be completely even, that would be stupid and boring. I said JFK have the stat advantage because they do. Before these kinds of super wars start ppl like to speculate on who has the upper hand, who will win etc etc. I don´t see why this is so sensitive now.

Definitely nothing wrong with analyzing.

I suppose the point I was trying to get across was that..
IF SA (or any other faction) was trying to prove their strength against another faction then it should be done purely with the players and resources they have without no extra help or handicap. If a faction is wealthier, stronger (in stats), more organized, etc then obviously they worked hard and are up there for a reason.
Theres a difference between having a "just for fun" war and a "im better than you" war.

if you just want to have fun then sure. Set terms, make it more balanced, whatever.
but if you're trying to prove somethen then there shouldn't be any complaints that they have 20 players with 20+b stats or whatever all these silly debates are going on about.

Again, nothing wrong with analyzing and such but it gets pretty old seeing some posts where people complain and bitch about the other faction having much stronger players and whatnot.

No one in TC will rank SA as number 1, if they win 1 WAR against JFK...lol

I'd rank them as #1, they might declare a day early and get db's from every angle and might play a little dirty with BB it's all good fun right? [:sick:]

I think it should be locked rosters because it is really sa vs jfk, so it's fair. It doesn't matter if they are stronger, we know, but we can't help it if they are stronger. Just my opinion anyways.

Fun is diferent from HONOR.
You probably dont have the age to understand that...