Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Civilization VI

Started by Joann_Pierce [2125923] on in Gaming.

19 replies · 101 views · thread synced · 8 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 20 / 20 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
20
Discussion span
→
People posting
9
Likes on archived posts
8
Authority score
8 / 100
Historical score
16 / 100
Story score
34 / 100
Engagement score
56 / 100
Joann_Pierce [2125923]

Does anyone here play, either just Civilization VI, or the Rise and Fall expansion? Also, would anyone be interested in perhaps playing a multiplayer game if so? 
DrZed [237786]

I Have it and the rise and fall expansion. Although I would say Two and four were my favourite. four with the beyond the sword expansion.  Vi I find better than V.



I have never played a multiplayer game. Although would not take a lot of time?



I would not mind trying but I do not know if I have the time at the moment.
DrZed [237786]

I usually play Japan. Although on the Rise and fall I found Poundmaker of the Cree has a lot of advantages.

I switched because I was wanting to do a game of Earth from real life start locations or original start locations or whatever that mode is called. Where Japan is so disadvantaged in that.. So I picked all other locations that were not in North or South America. So I would have all that area free before others came about. 
Joann_Pierce [2125923]

It's True Start Earth. Though, if you want the same conditions of earth, without having the disanvanteges of a bad starting position, just put in Earth. It gives the Earth conditions the same as True Start Earth, but you start in a random spot.

It really depends on the players, and the turn timer. No turn timer typically takes a while, and the standered one has the same amount of time per turn. For that reason I prefer the dynamic turn timer, which gives you more time depending on the complexity(Ie, amount of units, city numbers, and the era).

Would you like to play a 3v3 game maybe, sometime? We could ally against either the AI's or other players, depending on your preference. 
A_Mean_Person [1631303]

I have the base game, didn't get the expansion (not yet at least) . I do enjoy the game and have played it for a while, but when i want to play something of the sort and have to pick, i usually pick Europa Universallis IV to play instead. 

Still i'm all in for getting ass kicked in a multiplayer game.
MrLuna [2127461]

I haven't played Civ 6 in awhile, but I must say I kinda miss playing it and then keep telling myself just one more turn before sleeping over and over till the sun come up, ah those sleepless nights. 

if I ever get the chance on re-downloading it again. 

I'd would probably like to play a game or two. 
MrLuna [2127461]

Hmm well it depends on my mood and playstyle, but generally I pinball between Gorgo, Tomyris, Cleo and Medici.

And occasionally I'd use another civ just to keep things fresh, usually Japan, cause well samurais

Edit: whoops didn't quote
Joann_Pierce [2125923]

What's your favorite victoire then? Cultural, Scientific, domination, faith, score? Cause Medici, and Cleo, I think are culture suited, whereas Tomaris and Georgo are domination. Can't remeber Japan off the top of my head. 
MrLuna [2127461]

I guess overall domination, even when I'm using Cleo and Medici, nothing like conquest and world domination.

But in general I try to play to a leader's strengths  or weaknesses if I feel particularly masochistic or if I need a challenge.

Now I haven't played Civ 6 as much as did the previous entries so my recollection isn't perfect and I might be wrong but I remember that Japan was a good early game dominator do to the samurais and passive bonuses they have
Laeril [2139919]

Just got a war declared against me by Genghis Khan in Rise and Fall. I am playing Korea, which probably has nothing to do with it. I did refuse to trade a great work of writing with him, so that might have something to do with it. Most likely, though, he's just a dick.
MrLuna [2127461]

True, true most have good early game unit benefits. Which makes a good early start and domination victory appealing, but as it enters to late game it really depends how well one did earlier on. 
EagleScream [2086034]

Civilization 6 is just horrible.  There are some elements to it which make it really cool but the stupid AI, and the lack of fixes of simple things by the developer make it a total waste of money and time.  IMO worst Civ of them all...

My CIV ranks (based on what you could do with them when released....)

Civ 2

Civ 5

Civ

Civ 4

Civ 3

Civ 6