True, but I still like to see Insurgency 2.0 xD
NS vs SA (Cancelled) Midknight backs out
Started by DUDE [1028023] on in Faction Discussion.
Posts archived: 389 / 389 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
We are?
Not you noob. Your superiors.
u like insurgency 2.0, but they'd hate to lose again :(
pls respecc their feelings :(
pls respecc their feelings :(
I dont think you understand why Insurgency was formed in the first place.
I have my idea on the ordeal, but please enlighten me and others here, if you'ed be so kind...
Insurgency was formed to combat the combined might of TUN, who essentially collared the war market. Nobody could challenge any of them to a war without being fought by all of them. Which is a task beyond anyone on their own.
Insurgency is gone now. It would only likely return if many factions teamed up to battle someone else in an unfair manner.
If anyone else joined this theoretical war, it would give ground to the other allies to join in. 1vs1 is what folk want, to test themselves against factions without fearing a multi pointed retal.
Insurgency is gone now. It would only likely return if many factions teamed up to battle someone else in an unfair manner.
If anyone else joined this theoretical war, it would give ground to the other allies to join in. 1vs1 is what folk want, to test themselves against factions without fearing a multi pointed retal.
I heard Aunty Torn wants a piece of those rugged hands.
Anyways, should be a fun fight, I can't see R* staying neutral though.
Anyways, should be a fun fight, I can't see R* staying neutral though.
Probably a termed war, which means two things...
1. Dude is blowing things out of proportion.
2. Whomever snitched to Dude is a piece of shit that I hope is kicked from the faction.
No one likes a snitch.
1. Dude is blowing things out of proportion.
2. Whomever snitched to Dude is a piece of shit that I hope is kicked from the faction.
No one likes a snitch.
Eloquently put, so basically Insurgency restored balance in a way and put some egos to rest ingame, right?
One thing though, I don't think that the Insurgency alliance is gone, the war is over now but the forging made earlier can never be broken imo.
One thing though, I don't think that the Insurgency alliance is gone, the war is over now but the forging made earlier can never be broken imo.
Yes, they wanted to show that TUN could be beaten in their entirety I guess, that they wouldnt stand for group warring. I'm not sure though, I dont belong to either side so its outsider thoughts.
They may be allies and friends but if JFK warred Relentless 1vs1 tomorrow, I doubt the rest could join in without losing face for being hypocritical.
They may be allies and friends but if JFK warred Relentless 1vs1 tomorrow, I doubt the rest could join in without losing face for being hypocritical.
JFK vs R*1 at the moment would be bullying am sure they don't need the rest of Insurgency to do anything
Unless JFK attracted a few guests beforehand, Relentless will win on account of more activeness overall, without any guests.
JFK is washed out, but rely on their affiliated factions for years, yet claim superiority for too long now.
My personal opinion anyways.
JFK is washed out, but rely on their affiliated factions for years, yet claim superiority for too long now.
My personal opinion anyways.
![[image: i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/gWqxLkp/Uyb0-V1560208704.png){kind=link}
Thanks, I'll print this out and hang it over my bed lol
Ya we get it, you can't do anything on your own
" Pen deft XIII Rjkc4. I don't think they have a chance"
NS leader who wishes to remain anonymous
NS leader who wishes to remain anonymous
Aye, I'm helpless you know :p
So by stating this you prove to be the opposite then?
So by stating this you prove to be the opposite then?
SA? Champion disbanded that weeks ago nub
Don't forget all of NS used to lick Z's chode a couple of months back.
We liberated y'all.
We liberated y'all.