As for you stating that eliminating you would bring an anticlimactic end to the competition...I'm not sure about that...lumbers betraying you was much, much more satisfying than to watch than you doing what was planned from the beginning:)
This year's elims had enough drama and salt to possibly last us another decade
Again...they were very very smart establishing themselves as the strongest teams first....
Check out the recruitment thread...first page is full of lumbers advertising their team....the smarter players woulda known by then their smartest choice:D
LJ would have violated an alliance at this point regardless of who the target was...
It was you, so though luck... for you... and good luck for the other two...
If your leadership did not try to do the same, then blame yourselves not us... Who would pick on a weakling at 4 and then risk a 2 vs 1 with another strong team and the remainder underdog? (yes, because they would be forced to team up with someone intentionally or not)
That would be just stupid.
1 strong vs the 2 weaker ones was the only way to go. I thought they would play smart and get rid of the best one (LJ) but gladly for us it seems FM got the short end of the stick... Guess our leadership did play their part nicely on that.
Everyone knew LJ were going to be a force to be reckoned with and yet not one team wanted to turn on their alliance to force out LJ or get their tickets down to a manageable amount. Good job to the LJ you played a good game sitting on top picking off teams one at a time.
we didnt sit all the way there tho, we were focused but they couldnt pin us down so switched targets to eliminate our alliance and we did a pretty bang up job of saving our alliance
5 teams could not pin us on zero at the push barring that one time and life lost. We jumped from 0 to almost 100 tickets at the hour, FM as great a team they are could not stand against LJ's in 1v1 situation