The sources are clickable and lead you directly to it. It's not very difficult to understand. You though it seems don't want to understand that because from your personal feeling you don't agree with it. It's called denial.
Andy Ngo
Started by Viracocha [1772040] on in Politics & Law.
Posts archived: 67 / 67 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
some black dude in new york pushes a jew on a subway and thats a right wing hate crime.
even if the numbers are right they correlate with mass immigration. if you wanted domestic terrorism, do something extreme like flood the country with a million + immigrants every year. youll radicalize alot of people. its undeniable. ultimately the government is responsible for putting people into this situation.
america specifically is a nation of rebels. so why is this happening? it makes no sense.
there shouldnt be any islamic terrorism in America, or Europe, and there is solely because immigration.
we see a rise in domestic terrorism in Europe as a inconvenient result of mass immigration as well.
maybe we should be a little more thoughtful of the kinda world we live in, and human nature which is reactionary btw. before more people get hurt.
even if the numbers are right they correlate with mass immigration. if you wanted domestic terrorism, do something extreme like flood the country with a million + immigrants every year. youll radicalize alot of people. its undeniable. ultimately the government is responsible for putting people into this situation.
america specifically is a nation of rebels. so why is this happening? it makes no sense.
there shouldnt be any islamic terrorism in America, or Europe, and there is solely because immigration.
we see a rise in domestic terrorism in Europe as a inconvenient result of mass immigration as well.
maybe we should be a little more thoughtful of the kinda world we live in, and human nature which is reactionary btw. before more people get hurt.
[image: imgur.com]
Domestic terrorism is actually going down rapidly in Europe, and most of it comes from separatist movements, not from Islamic countries, by a far majority so not immigration related.
Terrorism has existed since the beginning of the first civilisations.
Domestic terrorism is actually going down rapidly in Europe, and most of it comes from separatist movements, not from Islamic countries, by a far majority so not immigration related.
Terrorism has existed since the beginning of the first civilisations.
haha. i like the pivot from right wing terrorist attacks once its suggested it correlates with mass immigration. thats when you say terrorism is going down. you gotta be very crafty with these people.
i say good. looks like theres alot of leftist terrorism unfortunately though. barely see any right wing terrorist attacks from your graph there.
i say good. looks like theres alot of leftist terrorism unfortunately though. barely see any right wing terrorist attacks from your graph there.
literally just click any of the sources and test it for yourself. its 1 click on the mouse
For the US it is completely different, not so much separatists over there . Alt right wing terrorism is a big problem in the US and the biggest source of terrorism.
Yes, Europe is different than the USA in that perspective, I'm not claiming all lefties are good and all rightists are bad, Europe in general is also more left wing than the USA although we see a rapidly growing right wing in some countries. Normally after 4 years those right wing parties make a mess of it and get voted out again. This happens for decades already.
In number of killings the right wing terrorists beat the leftists by far though. Left wing terrorism is normally fixated on killing a certain target while right wing terrorist as well as an Islamic terrorist normally want to kill as much people as possible because they are left/Muslim/Jewish/unbeliever or whatever.
There is no left wing terrorist attack which killed more than 10 people since 1925 in Europe.
In number of killings the right wing terrorists beat the leftists by far though. Left wing terrorism is normally fixated on killing a certain target while right wing terrorist as well as an Islamic terrorist normally want to kill as much people as possible because they are left/Muslim/Jewish/unbeliever or whatever.
There is no left wing terrorist attack which killed more than 10 people since 1925 in Europe.
Show me the bodies curly
no shit, I can click on the sources? damn...wish I knew that...oh wait I have done that many times now...that's how this conversation started...
but instead of expecting me to do YOUR research, why not just post the info straight from the sources that YOU should be reading to make sure your not being misled...
but instead of expecting me to do YOUR research, why not just post the info straight from the sources that YOU should be reading to make sure your not being misled...
you could also use the sources themselves instead of a questionable collection of sources...but I guess its too much to ask for you to inform yourself before you try to "inform" others.
Is it any surprise the same think-tanks who coopted Libertarianism as a right-wing position could make the idea of being against Fascism a negative thing?
well depends on how we are defining fascism, as currently its being flung far and wide, like ADHD diagnosis.
currently the goal posts are being moved considerably.
currently the goal posts are being moved considerably.
I won't disagree with that notion. Not everything that hurts some obscure leftist's feelings is fascistic.
that's not how it works slacker. if you doubt a number or statement from the wiki page you check the source.
I provided my argument and 363+ sources to back it up.
you are straight-up delusional.
I provided my argument and 363+ sources to back it up.
you are straight-up delusional.
so you dont educate yourself? noted, now i know just about everything you say is a complete waste of time to read...if you believe everything you read without checking sources you will only look like a fool.
BTW i did check the sources on the first link your buddy posted an thats how all this started....i also never said it was wrong, just stated theres a good chance it could be bias...why would i do the homework twice on the same subject?
BTW i did check the sources on the first link your buddy posted an thats how all this started....i also never said it was wrong, just stated theres a good chance it could be bias...why would i do the homework twice on the same subject?
2013 ?
of course back then it was neo nazis but since then Id say jihadi have picked up
According to the latest Europol report. there were 1,056 arrests made for terrorist offences in the EU last year. Of these, 511 were related to jihadist terrorism. Nevertheless, the majority of the 129 attacks completed, foiled or failed were related to ethno-nationalism and separatism (83).
Terrorism claimed the lives of 13 people in the EU in 2018, with an additional 53 people suffering injuries. All of these fatalities and most of the casualties occurred as a result of jihadist attacks.
https://www.statista.com/chart/9846/terrorism-in-europe-map/
[image: www.europarl.europa.eu]
of course back then it was neo nazis but since then Id say jihadi have picked up
According to the latest Europol report. there were 1,056 arrests made for terrorist offences in the EU last year. Of these, 511 were related to jihadist terrorism. Nevertheless, the majority of the 129 attacks completed, foiled or failed were related to ethno-nationalism and separatism (83).
Terrorism claimed the lives of 13 people in the EU in 2018, with an additional 53 people suffering injuries. All of these fatalities and most of the casualties occurred as a result of jihadist attacks.
https://www.statista.com/chart/9846/terrorism-in-europe-map/
[image: www.europarl.europa.eu]
you are illiterate.
so i cant read because you refuse to do it yourself...awesome, thank you.
(F.Y.I. i can write just fine as well)
(F.Y.I. i can write just fine as well)
Just cant seem to find or comprehend sources.
already proved that incorrect....but sure we can play pretend.