Armour Coverage

While doing something else found these dunno how they relate to anything but here is coverage data for all the armour on market at mo

It's in reference to this thread/post:
https://www.torn.com/forums.php#/p=threads&f=19&t=16188851&b=0&a=0&start=60&to=20863153

Leather Boots
Full Body Coverage: 15.54%
Foot Coverage: 100%
Leg Coverage: 8.77%

Leather Gloves
Full Body Coverage: 14.30%
Hand Coverage: 100%

Leather Pants
Full Body Coverage: 24.17%
Leg Coverage: 100%
Groin Coverage: 100%
Foot Coverage: 15.49%
Stomach Coverage: 7.50%

Leather Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 3.14%
Head Coverage: 35.12%
Throat Coverage: 8.84%

Leather Vest
Full Body Coverage: 21.12%
Heart Coverage: 97.27%
Stomach Coverage: 95.09%
Chest Coverage: 90.22%
Arm Coverage: 6.50%

Chain Mail
Full Body Coverage: 39.41%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 100%
Arm Coverage: 99.90%
Groin Coverage: 48.46%
Leg Coverage: 1.93%

Flak Jacket
Full Body Coverage: 26.52%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 99.99%
Chest Coverage: 96.42%
Arm Coverage: 35.79%
Groin Coverage: 3.12%
Leg Coverage: 0.14%

Police Vest
Full Body Coverage: 26.79%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 95.44%
Arm Coverage: 35.34%
Groin Coverage: 7.45%
Leg Coverage: 0.77%

Hiking Boots
Full Body Coverage: 15.03%
Foot Coverage: 100%
Leg Coverage: 5.22%

Construction Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 2.84%
Head Coverage: 39.68%

Bulletproof Vest
Full Body Coverage: 32.70%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 95.45%
Groin Coverage: 89.16%
Arm Coverage: 35.87%
Leg Coverage: 0.78%

Full Body Armor
Full Body Coverage: 48.46%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 100%
Arm Coverage: 100%
Throat Coverage: 90.68%
Groin Coverage: 60.68%
Hand Coverage: 13.40%
Leg Coverage: 0.28%

Safety Boots
Full Body Coverage: 14.96%
Foot Coverage: 100%
Leg Coverage: 4.74%

WWII Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 4.64%
Head Coverage: 64.85%

Kevlar Gloves
Full Body Coverage: 14.34%
Hand Coverage: 100%
Arm Coverage: 0.32%

Outer Tactical Vest
Full Body Coverage: 27.54%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 100%
Groin Coverage: 35.95%
Arm Coverage: 23.91%
Leg Coverage: 0.93%

Combat Boots
Full Body Coverage: 15.42%
Foot Coverage: 100%
Leg Coverage: 7.92%

Combat Gloves
Full Body Coverage: 14.34%
Hand Coverage: 100%
Arm Coverage: 0.32%

Combat Pants
Full Body Coverage: 24.29%
Leg Coverage: 100%
Groin Coverage: 100%
Foot Coverage: 16.28%
Stomach Coverage: 7.62%

Combat Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 4.83%
Head Coverage: 67.49%

Combat Vest
Full Body Coverage: 27.45%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 100%
Groin Coverage: 36.04%
Arm Coverage: 23.18%
Leg Coverage: 0.98%

Motorcycle Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 7.76%
Head Coverage: 85.35%
Throat Coverage: 23.19%

Liquid Body Armor
Full Body Coverage: 24.12%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 99.59%
Chest Coverage: 98.48%
Arm Coverage: 19.85%

Medieval Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 9.71%
Head Coverage: 93.54
Throat Coverage: 42.24

Flexible Body Armor
Full Body Coverage: 26.96
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 96.57%
Chest Coverage: 95.73%
Arm Coverage: 36.16%
Groin Coverage: 11.88%
Leg Coverage: 0.51%

Welding Helmet
Full Body Coverage: 10.70%
Head Coverage: 100%
Throat Coverage: 49.53%

Hazmat Suit
Full Body Coverage: 97.85%
Heart Coverage: 100%
Stomach Coverage: 100%
Chest Coverage: 100%
Arm Coverage: 100%
Groin Coverage: 100%
Leg Coverage: 100%
Throat Coverage: 100%
Hand Coverage: 100%
Foot Coverage: 100%
Head Coverage: 70%

Kevlar Gloves
Full Body Coverage: 14.33
Hand Coverage: 100.00
Arm Coverage: 0.40
Stomach Coverage: 0.11 <-- What?

Interesting info btw. Where did you get it? It also show that the full body armor is the cheap chest piece that has the better cover around.

Looks like Ched simulated them finally but hasn't released whatever method of display yet, cool. Will work on some images / tables etc and get this sorta stuff into the wiki.

It's in reference to this thread/post: https://www.torn.com/forums.php#/p=threads&f=19&t=16188851&b=0&a=0&start=60&to=20863153

This is interesting stuff!!

Awesome thanks. Didn't even know about this

looks like a high quality body armor would give a total of 203.3 total armor protection while a high quality flexible would only give 146.39

You have to take into consideration armor ovelapping (we don't know how it works), body part hit probability (no hard data) and body part damage multiplier (no hard data). It isn't so simple to compare them.

You have to take into consideration armor ovelapping (we don't know how it works),

value of armour defaults to highest armour value if there is more than 100% coverage

body part hit probability (no hard data)

i have a pretty good idea now

body part damage multiplier (no hard data)

i've had a very good idea of this for some time

i'm working on some stuff with this but there are some complex considerations to make the most of comparisons, and i wouldn;t want to publish anything before ched actually announces / released those numbers for the first time to ensure they're "final"

It's true body part hit probability is very important ,id like to see some calculations they would be very valuable.i had no idea of armor overlapping aswell :P

welp can't tell if that makes my hazmat good or bad

Good, informative post.

Good versus people that will use temps against you, not amazing for people that rely on standard attacks. Perhaps arm yourself with a flash or a smoke or something to debuff them so those stats are just a fraction of what they thought they are?

Were a few changes so updated