Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Graved

Started by Mrbig2 [2548299] on in Graveyard.

59 replies · 486 views · thread synced · 3 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 60 / 60 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
60
Discussion span
→
Authority score
41 / 100
Historical score
23 / 100
Story score
60 / 100
Engagement score
72 / 100

People posting, likes and official posts are not counted for this thread yet: on threads longer than one page they come from a periodic pass over the archive, which has not covered it.

Most-liked replies

Viracocha [1772040]
I've actually known to adult males in my personal life who apparently held such views. Both of course were not welcome near me nor my home.

They exist, and they are not shunned within that community inexplicably.
Collete [1389080]
I think it was poor taste given how america is they should have pushed more for acceptance and also doesnt help if a few of them are registered sex offenders all this does is bring a backlash onto the community .
Mrbig2 [2548299]
We definitely do agree to ban circumcision And anybody who performs it should go to jail or worse not Sure why you think I am in favour of circumcision
RambleRocket [2200354]
why would right wingers be in favour of circumcision?

circumcision isnt a white european thing.... the only people that circumcised were... well am i even allowed to say who without it sounding bad? lol but its not a white european tradition.... why did america start circumcising? they didnt get it from white nations/europe at all as that isnt our tradition.... thats a jewish tradition... and so why would the right wing be for circumcision when the right wing supposedly dont like the jews and blame them for everything?
WiseTheRumGone [2078276]
because they are circumsised and they want their sons to be circumsised so their penis looks simialr.

its really f**king weird. but somehow thats the norm over there.
RambleRocket [2200354]
well yeah, generally people that sing about going after your children are pedos...

infact in the uk, if you so much as look at another persons child your considered a ***** right away. you shouldnt look or acknowledge another persons child at all. stay away from children, its not really that hard to do lol anyone interested in a child that isnt theres is immediately branded a pedo in the uk.

edit: although the BBC will likely protect the pedos still as thats what the BBC do
Remilia [1284087]
Imaging making a song about corrupting children, while convicted sex offenders sing in the background.

Pretty high level satire my dude.
Remilia [1284087]
Imagine being okay with a satirical song about corrupting children, sung by convicted CHILD SEX OFFENDERS and thinking you are one of the good guys.
angrysc0tsman12 [1099272]
I'm okay with a satirical song because of the qualifier SATIRICAL. I'm glad a song like this exists because it helps to show peoples prejudices when they think this is even a remotely realistic possibility.

Sung by convicted child sex offenders? I think you need to follow the sagely advice of Abraham Lincoln when he said "Don't believe everything you read on the internet"
Remilia [1284087]
Instead of blindly following ideology, why don't you have a look at people whom you support? The first post of this thread literally provides the information that show several of these people engaged in "satire" about influencing children are child sex offenders who HAVE TOUCHED CHILDREN, and at last tally the number is at 6 members of the choir being in that video linked to sexual child abuse....

Imagine defending satire by literal child sex offenders, jesus christ what have we come too. Western civilization on display folks. We have reached weimar republic levels of absolute lunacy here, and these people still don't see any problem with this. Obviously because they don't care about protecting children as long as the big dick of progressiveness grinds ever forward.

Anyone who thinks this is okay needs a lobotomy with a chainsaw, and I would vote for anyone who promised to give them one.
CRLF [2095076]
I believe what he is saying is, that OP may not be correct. Either those people are not sex offenders, or are not members of the choir, or were members at some time before being convicted.

If you read carefully, the names do not even match exactly. The easiest thing to do is go through the roster and google each name to see if someone of the same name (but a different person) is a sex offender.

For example, Lawrence Earl Friedberg, the sex offender:

[image: arrestfacts.com]

Earl Friedberg, the choir member:

[image: gyazo.com]

The entire thread is obviously someone's homophobic rant. No one has the time to vet out every lie in the OP.

It's most likely that NONE of the supposed sex offenders are members of the choir.

This just plays off of the stereotype that all gays are sex offenders. Give it a rest, eh?