Implement a wealth tax, the richer the player the more they pay in tax. The tax is then redistributed to subscribers.
Bonus idea: non-subscribers are taxed at 2x the usual rate
Bonus idea: non-subscribers are taxed at 2x the usual rate
How to increase subscriptions
Started by bilbo_boggins [2761682] on in Suggestions.
About this thread
Posts archived: 6 / 6 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.
- Archived posts
- 6
- Discussion span
- →
- People posting
- 4
- Likes on archived posts
- 3
- Authority score
- 26 / 100
- Historical score
- 16 / 100
- Story score
- 36 / 100
- Engagement score
- 42 / 100
Uhh, way too Pay to Win.
Your mother is subcribtions
which is more pay to win, a monthly cash payment or a permanent+50 to the energy bar?
torn already has pay to win elements and with cost of living crisis ched's business could do with the extra income.
torn already has pay to win elements and with cost of living crisis ched's business could do with the extra income.
I think that this suggestion is too pay to win. Yes, Torn has elements of pay to win but it doesn't necessarily affect the non-paying players. Subscribers simply have more features/advantages. This idea directly places a disadvantage to non-subscribers by creating a tax at double rate.
Forcefully redistributing wealth to subscribers would actually be more pay to win. Money pays for far stronger energy bonuses than the +50, even if I think that is also pay to win.