321 replies · 1.58k views · thread synced · 10 days ago
· View on torn.com
About this thread
Posts archived:322 / 322 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.
Archived posts
322
Discussion span
→
Authority score
32 / 100
Historical score
23 / 100
Story score
52 / 100
Engagement score
85 / 100
People posting, likes and official posts are not counted for this thread yet: on threads longer than one page they come from a periodic pass over the archive, which has not covered it.
Most-liked replies
SporkMonkey[2065017]
· 11 likes · By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today. f**k em. The world is a better place. But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.
Odin-All-Father[2010524]
· 9 likes · Kids a legend, glad things are going well for him.
SporkMonkey[2065017]
· 7 likes · But a hero nonetheless. f**k the ShitLib Pedos.
Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.
OK, I'll admit he was in the right when he shot them but that does not explain why he was there in the first place. Having a rifle on him was pretty much an intimidation tool to attempt to restrict the protest and therefore freedom of speech.
None of that matters! He was exercising his 2A Right whether you like and appreciate it or not. He did not break any laws, as determined by a very anti-gun liberal law system and was found not guilty.
You may not like the outcome, but if you believe in the justice system and the Constitution, he was found not guilty. A pedo died and no one worthwhile mourned his death.
It was a protest, and one of the aspects of the protest was a show of support for the second amendment. The intention was not to intimidate. If people felt intimidate, then they didn't understand. However, the person who tried to shoot Rittenhouse, and the person attacking him with a skateboard, both were.
I wouldn't call him a hero necessarily. But to your statement in a previous comment "your hero killed people", the unfortunate reality is that sometimes people who are considered heroes are considered such exactly because they did kill someone.
I didnt insinuate that he broke any laws, just that his presence at the protest was just for intimidation in order to suppress other people's free speech. This man should be no hero to any constitutionalist at all
I mean he didn’t point it at anyone talking. He only pointed it at the felons trying to kill him or inflict great bodily injury. So while I do think he was a total milhouse for having it there, I think it is a ridiculous assertion to say he was restricting anyone’s protest.
When you have an object capable of killing a man with a single trigger press in your hands at a protest, that is intimidation and infringement on free speech