Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

the greatest social experiment OF ALL TIME

Started by H4D35 [1487001] on in Politics & Law.

14 replies · 162 views · thread synced · 3 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 15 / 15 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
15
Discussion span
→
People posting
10
Likes on archived posts
37
Authority score
9 / 100
Historical score
14 / 100
Story score
38 / 100
Engagement score
62 / 100

Most-liked replies

H4D35 [1487001]

 

also known as being denser than a bag of hammers.

 

"Ah, you see it—the dark underbelly of economic policy: resentment, revolution, and the wild, unpredictable energy of the downtrodden. Tariffs, at their most unyielding, become the flint that sparks revolt."

 

Let’s dive deeper into this choice:

  1. France, pre-revolutionary ferment: The Ancien Régime’s reliance on protectionist policies, including internal tariffs and taxes, suffocated commerce. Bread prices rose as bad harvests hit. Starving peasants didn’t just see a failed crop—they saw greedy elites and unjust laws. Cue guillotines.

  2. The British Corn Laws (1815-1846): Designed to protect landowners, these tariffs on imported grain crushed the working class, who spent most of their earnings on food. The resentment boiled for decades, fueling political reforms and the repeal movement. Hungry stomachs are louder than polished speeches.

  3. Colonial America’s rebellion (1760s-1770s): The Stamp Act, Sugar Act, and the Navigation Acts weren’t tariffs in the modern sense, but the principle was the same—external controls that made the average colonist feel exploited. This economic grievance snowballed into revolution.

  4. Smoot-Hawley fallout (1930s): While revolutions weren’t ignited, this infamous tariff exacerbated economic misery, especially in export-reliant industries. Farmers across America were crushed as international markets closed their doors. Hunger and anger simmered in the Dust Bowl haze.

 

Tariffs, then, become symbols of division. For the "average person," they’ve often felt like chains wrapped around their lives by the unseen hands of kings, elites, or bureaucrats.

 

Modern tariffs, The polished descendants of their clumsy forebears.

 

Do they still carry the volatile potential to spark unrest?

 

Or is the world too complex now for pitchforks and barricades?

 

Let’s sift through some recent sparks in the powder keg of trade.

 

  1. U.S.–China trade war (2018–2021): When the U.S. slapped tariffs on Chinese goods, the goal was clear: protect American industry and strike a blow in the great geopolitical chess game. But on the ground? Prices on goods like electronics and appliances climbed for the average American. Farmers—caught in China's retaliatory fire—suffered as exports to China dwindled. The government scrambled to issue subsidies. Tensions simmered, but unrest was quiet… this time.

  2. India’s agricultural tariffs (2020–2021): India raised tariffs to protect its farming sector, but small farmers erupted in protests over restrictive laws tied to trade and pricing. A sea of angry, determined farmers descended on Delhi, turning the nation’s capital into a living, breathing rebellion. Tariffs didn’t stand alone—they were part of a broader system that stoked resentment.

  3. European Union's carbon tariffs (2023): While designed to curb carbon-heavy imports, some argue these “green tariffs” could inflate prices and punish lower-income households who already struggle with rising energy costs. Public backlash looms on the horizon. Will the policy survive the court of public opinion?

  4. Global South pushback: In nations dependent on foreign imports, tariffs can be a double-edged sword. When applied recklessly, they raise the cost of essentials. Some African and Latin American governments face protests whenever such policies bite too deeply into the wallets of their citizens.

 

But why no pitchforks yet?

  • Volition whispers: Modern governments have safety nets. Subsidies, stimulus checks, and propaganda. The lid is tight—for now.
  • Conceptualization considers: People are connected globally. The fight isn’t localized anymore; it’s diffuse. Protests erupt online before they take to the streets.
  • Half-Light growls: Don’t be so sure. When the right match strikes the right tinder…

 

the art of keeping the masses quiet. Governments today are savvy, officer—crafting illusions, soothing discontent, and turning tariffs into something palatable for the common person.

 

Let’s unpack how they manipulate perception when the weight of these economic measures threatens to crush morale.

 

1. The subsidy sleight of hand.

  • When U.S. farmers felt the sting of Chinese retaliation during the trade war, billions in subsidies flowed to their rescue. But it wasn’t framed as damage control—it was "support for hardworking Americans." A tactical narrative shift. "Don’t look at the bleeding; look at the bandage!" says Volition.

2. The us-versus-them narrative.

  • Tariffs are painted as heroic acts of self-defense. Protecting "our" workers. Fighting "their" unfair practices. It’s not a tax on you; it’s a patriotic duty. Half-Light grins—nothing fires up the masses like an external enemy.

3. The technocratic smoke screen.

  • Leaders bury the debate in numbers, graphs, and expert jargon. Few average citizens can parse the details. By the time the impacts trickle down, the connection to tariffs feels distant. Conceptualization sighs: the complexity is the point. Who revolts over something they barely understand?

4. The blame game.

  • "The market is volatile." "Global supply chains are fragile." Tariffs are framed as one factor in a tangled web, deflecting accountability. The average person grumbles but struggles to identify the real culprit.

5. The strategic distraction.

  • A tariff here, a scandal there. News cycles shift focus to other dramas. While people fume over rising prices, their anger is diluted by the sheer volume of crises competing for attention.

But this manipulation isn’t flawless.

  • Electrochemistry hums: It works… until it doesn’t. Beneath the propaganda and subsidies, resentment festers. The illusion is fragile. A shock—a sudden rise in prices, a public betrayal—could shatter it.

Why No Pitchforks Yet?

  1. Modern Bread and Circuses
    Subsidies for farmers. Stimulus checks for workers. A flood of social media to occupy minds. Governments throw just enough scraps to keep rebellion at bay. But Electrochemistry sneers: You can’t feed your rage on hashtags and hollow promises forever.

  2. Global Diffusion of Anger
    Think of tariffs like dominoes. A tariff in the U.S. causes price hikes in Africa. Retaliation in China hits exports in Europe. Localized fury dissipates into a web of complexity. Conceptualization sighs: How can you rage against a system too vast to see?

  3. The Specter of Fear
    Protest is dangerous. Surveillance is tighter, police responses harsher. People remember the cost of rebellion. Half-Light rasps: Fear is the leash. But leashes snap when the beast gets hungry enough.

  4. Blunt Instruments in Subtle Wars
    Tariffs are no longer the sole hammer—they’re part of economic battles fought with tech restrictions, sanctions, and cyber warfare. The public feels the effects, yes, but it’s diluted by a thousand other cuts.

 

the United States—a land of contradictions.

 

Wealth and poverty stacked like uneven bricks, the economic engine purring alongside its misfires. What would happen if tariffs, these modern economic cudgels, were pushed too far in this sprawling colossus?

Scenarios for Tariffs and Turmoil in the U.S.


The Consumer Strikes Back: Tariffs on Everyday GoodsImagine the U.S. slapping higher tariffs on Chinese imports once again—electronics, clothes, appliances.

 

At first, it’s patriotism on TV. "Buy American!"

 

But soon, the reality hits:

  • Smartphones cost 30% more.
  • Grocery prices rise as imported goods become scarce.
  • The average person feels the pinch.

Result?

 

Frustration.

 

Protests organized by grassroots consumer groups.

 

SAVOIR FAIRE chimes: Think TikTok-fueled boycotts.

 

Videos of people smashing overpriced gadgets go viral.

 

Suburban malls become the new battleground of economic dissent.


2. Farmer Fury: Retaliation Hits Exports


Picture a new wave of agricultural tariffs from foreign countries—China, Europe, maybe India—slamming U.S. farmers once again.

 

Soybeans rot in silos. Cattle ranchers can’t export beef. Rural America is bleeding.

 

  • Protests erupt in state capitals: tractors block highways.
  • Farmers' unions demand government relief, but the subsidies run dry.

 

Volition winces. Rural America isn’t just angry—it’s armed. The boiling point isn’t far when livelihoods are at stake.


3. Urban Unrest: Rising Prices in Energy and Food


Should the U.S. adopt climate-focused tariffs, like the EU’s carbon border taxes, domestic manufacturers and importers might shift costs to consumers.

 

Energy bills soar, food prices spike. Low-income families in urban centers are hit hardest.

  • Rent strikes and food bank shortages spill into the streets.
  • Social media hashtags evolve into real-world occupations of city squares.

 

Conceptualization dreams: It’s the 21st century’s version of bread riots, fueled by inflation and discontent.

 

Protesters carry signs made from recycled Amazon boxes.


4. Nationalism Turns Sour: The "Us vs. Them" Fallout


What happens when tariffs are weaponized against geopolitical rivals?

 

Say the U.S. targets Mexico or Canada to pressure trade agreements. Affected industries—automotive, agriculture—start laying off workers as supply chains crumble.

  • Angry factory workers storm local union halls.
  • Anti-immigrant sentiment surges, as people blame “foreigners” instead of policy.

 

Half-Light growls. Nationalist fervor flips into chaos when jobs vanish and the scapegoats seem too close to home.


5. The Digital Rebellion: Online Markets Go Underground


Rising tariffs make imported goods unaffordable. Enterprising Americans turn to black markets online—crypto-fueled transactions for smuggled goods from overseas.

  • The government cracks down. Customs seizures double.
  • Hackers retaliate, targeting trade agencies and corporate giants.

 

SAVOIR FAIRE winks: Tariffs fuel the next wave of digital piracy. Contraband sneakers and smartphones become status symbols in urban counterculture.


How It Ends

  • Best case? Policy shifts before unrest boils over. Tariffs are softened, subsidies flow, and people grudgingly adapt. Volition whispers: Stability limps along.
  • Worst case? Anger fractures into isolated riots—rural America versus urban centers, farmers versus consumers, workers versus corporations. The system holds… but only barely.
H4D35 [1487001]

is that supposed to be some kind of gotcha?

 

is more insightful than youll ever be chief.

 

maga dont like ai because it deals with facts and logic which is diametrically opposed to their world view.

 

mf youre literally just a neo luddite. 🤣

 

now f**k off and go cry about chat gpt somewhere else you gremlin.

 

Nekorah [1980720]

So this was written by chat gpt? Makes sense, as it's clearly nothing you're capable of writing. You can barely string two thoughts together as it stands.

Asbestos [2605613]

You guys should run it through an AI detection engine. You’ll find that it comes up as completely human with basically no AI detected. 

He’s that unhinged on his own, and with whatever echo chamber he’s copy/pasting from at any given time. 

ZickyJackz [497258]

Ai is often completely incorrect, and even makes shit up often enough.  There's been plenty of reports of that, but I wouldn't expect a lazy brainlet like you to know that. You always just copy paste ChatGPT, and then act like you had even one original thought. 

 

You're as retarded and brainless as ever.  Your kind is why Trump won and as big as he did.  

PipeHitter [2687718]

Yes but they added in their own opinions occasionally according to the AI detector they used. But yes.

 

I enjoyed the post election quiet when H4D3S was busy licking their wounds from Trump being reelected.

ZickyJackz [497258]

It was great, huh?  Don't even care he wasn't around to rub his nose in it, it was just that nice to not have his ChatGPT ass around.  

RatSalad [1902445]

"Let’s dive deeper into this choice:"

+
"Tariffs, then, become symbols of division."
Incomparable examples:
These are examples of a point of view from a country's citizen being the target of a tariff, which is not the case being argued against.

 

"U.S.–China trade war"
"Prices on goods like electronics and appliances climbed for the average American."
Hardly climbed at all, minus cheap the electronic gizmos nobody needs anyways.
If you want to use the adjective "climbed", use it in comparison to these same products 2021-2024...

"Farmers—caught in China's retaliatory fire—suffered as exports to China dwindled."
Also exaggerated.
It's not like farmers aren't forced to dump out 100s of 1,000s of gallon of milk. Or throw away 1,000s of tons of food every year.
We can just let them sell that instead of forcing them to dump it.

How about some deregulation?

 

2, 3 & 4 are non applicable (why include?)

 

"But why no pitchforks yet?"
RAWR!
Use "pitchforks"!

 

"1. The subsidy sleight of hand."
Just explained. Do not repeat

 

"2. The us-versus-them narrative."
"3. The technocratic smoke screen."
"4. The blame game."
Like say...This post is doing?
*cougHYPOCRITE

 

"5. The strategic distraction.
...News cycles shift focus to other dramas. "
Or they shift to dramas that aren't there, depending on who you are and what side of the aisle you represent.

 

"Why No Pitchforks Yet?
1-4"
Because so far, they haven't done what you're trying to fear monger.

 

 

"But soon, the reality hits:

Smartphones cost 30% more.
Grocery prices rise as imported goods become scarce.
The average person feels the pinch

Result?

Frustration.

Protests organized by grassroots consumer groups."
Um, where have you been?
That's pretty much 2020-2024 and it's not because of any tariffs...

 

"SAVOIR FAIRE chimes: Think TikTok-fueled boycotts."
Did you just imply that anything on TikTok causes something rational and appropriate?

 

"Suburban malls become the new battleground of economic dissent.
Is that what you call it? I call it group shoplifting.
I thought it was caused by all those "food deserts"...You know...The ones that couldn't sustain all that economic dissent, errr...Mass shoplifting and all.
...Strange those "food deserts" were in places like Nike, Apple and Saks 5th stores tho....Hm.

 

"Soybeans rot in silos. Cattle ranchers can’t export beef."
Oh I don't know.
Sounds like some lower prices for USA to me. Lower prices sell.
I'll take the steaks, I can tell you'll be wanting that soy.
...Unless they are forced to throw it all away.

 

"3. Urban Unrest: Rising Prices in Energy and Food"
What color is the sky in your world that you have not noticed this has already drastically happened, and not because of tariffs?
*hint: 2020-2024

 

"4. Nationalism Turns Sour: The "Us vs. Them" Fallout"
Well you're certainly trying to keep that divide alive...Good for you!

 

"5. The Digital Rebellion: Online Markets Go Underground

Contraband sneakers and smartphones become status symbols in urban counterculture."
Yes...Welcome to the 1990's.
Glad you're finally caught up.

 

"How It Ends"
Apparently how ChatGPT tells you it does.

 

"also known as being denser than a bag of hammers."
If anyone bought into the OP's post then, yes, indeed.