Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Torn HoF Elite Rankings - 88,519 Players Ranked

Started by __-___-___-__ [1921241] on in General Discussion.

35 replies · 1.51k views · thread synced · 4 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 36 / 36 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
36
Discussion span
→
Authority score
59 / 100
Historical score
35 / 100
Story score
63 / 100
Engagement score
78 / 100

People posting, likes and official posts are not counted for this thread yet: on threads longer than one page they come from a periodic pass over the archive, which has not covered it.

Most-liked replies

Mentioned in this thread

Ikkakujuu [3240812] ×1

__-___-___-__ [1921241]

Hi everyone - I know what you're thinking from the title - this must be a fun side project, right? Well you nailed it.

While we patiently wait for Andyman's latest diversity rankings, I thought I'd look at the other end. When considering all 14 Public Hall Of Fame Leaderboards, who are the power houses and who's really #1?

It's BodyBagger. Of course. And he still gaps the competition. Depending on the circles you live in though, you'll probably see some new names. Before I explain it and lose the 5% who read more than the title, here's the full rankings and data so you can look yourself up, and your faction.

 

Disclaimer: You must be in the Top 25K players of at least one of the public HoFs to quality.

 

 

Oh, and I'm sure no-one is surprised that Monarch HQ has the highest aggregation of the top players either. Maybe you are surprised by the others though!

 

 

Now, let's get into the details on how it's calculated and a quick note on why it is done that way.

 

 

  1. The Top 25K Players and their rank are retrieved for each of the public HoFs via the API: level, busts, rank, travel time, work stats, networth, revives, defends, offences, attacks, awards, racing wins, racing points, racing skill
  2. For every HoF a player ranks in, the inverse of their ranks (1/Rank) are summed together to create a Elite HoF value. This means 1st in one HoF is worth 2x 2nd in two HoFs, 3x 3rd in three HoFs etc.
  3. The above value is converted to a score where 100%  = 1st place in all 14 HoFs to max 100% the best anyone could do. This is used to rank everyone against each other, but also gives people a way to set personal goals that are just about their own progress.
  4. A Faction's Elite HoF score is then calculated from every player that was eligible is added together. This again is normalized against an ideal 100% score that represents a faction of 100 people where they have someone who is 1st in all, someone who is 2nd in all, ... all the way to someone who is 100th in all. 

 

Now quickly on the why - notably why I use the inverse rank when, for example, Andyman's diversity report just sums the rank with lower = better. There are 2 key reasons: 1) Someone's Elite rank would get dominated by a single bad HoF rank - for example 13 1sts and 1 #25000 would be ranked way lower than someone who got 1000th in 14 HoFs, which is really weird. 2) It doesn't behave well when you expend the # of HoF ranks consider. My cut of is currently 25K, but if I change this to 100K people, many peoples ranks in the top 25K will completely change.

 

The spreadsheet (look yourself up, and your faction) also has some extra fields you can explore, such as was the player active at all in 2025 (there are some high ranked in-actives), what the players best rank was across all leaderboards (Andyman is the highest ranked without a 1st), and how many HoF leaderboards do they currently qualify for the Top 250 merit (ChristmasBazaar and M3G47HR0N tie for the most here with a staggering 11)

Are you happy with your rank? Would an overall leaderboard motivate you to improve your rankings?

Hamr [2027992]

I finally know why I feel so mid-tier: I am, in fact, mid.

 

 

Relatedy, how tf you doing Elite rankings without Karma?

 

Also just realised this neglects the battlestats HoF, which is gonna skew these results a tad

ExarionThar [1938327]

R+

It would be good to see the score for each faction in the Excel, not just its ranking position. To know what the difference is between them.

Secludedcommie [3713977]

If Bodybagger left monarch, how would that affect their rankings? Because since this data set is designed to encourage outliers, Bodybagger probably contributes an insane amount to their score.

__-___-___-__ [1921241]

They still would be #1, albeit with a reduced score of 6.90%.

 

If NS (#2) lost their best player, they would drop from #2 to #4 with a reduced score of 4.69%.

__-___-___-__ [1921241]

Not everyone can have a racing powerhouse like JCaine in their faction. Not only is Dandy Highwaymen nicely named, but it's also more racist than JUX.

dape08 [2887642]

It’s really well made!

 

It would be fun to find out whether you’re above or below average for your age.
I often think about whether I’m doing well or poorly compared to other players around the same age.

Qfiffle [2557282] Committee Committee

A more serious response though: while this is cool I think it would be interesting to try to untangle some of the correlated leaderboards a bit. If you are a heavy racer there's 3 boards you likely place highly on, while someone focusing on crimes probably only gets a small secondary benefit on awards and little else (*maybe* busts correlate with crimes, idk, but it's not as obvious as e.g. racing wins and racing points/skill), even though most people would probably say crimes is a bigger part of the game than racing. Similarly level and attacking are probably heavily correlated, while attacking and busting probably have no correlation other than that an active player is more likely to do both. So someone who excels on both the attacking and busting leaderboards is more diverse than someone who excels on attacking and level.

 

You could run a PCA on the spreadsheet and weight each metric based on the uniqueness of its contribution or something like that, might be interesting, but Idk that I can be bothered :P 

Five [959585]

This is very cool but the top 25K will definitely have swings for factions with more noobs, e.g. an example from our Faction Family

Naughty Souls - #97 (7M Respect)

Naughty Sanctuary - #53, all from one person.. CapturerHulkmad due to his #2 ranking in the Work Stats HOF, with 5 other members on the leaderboard all around the 15-25K mark. 

 

Looks like to improve my personal ranking, I need to smash through my revive merits and race more! 

Solaris [459981]

Why are there blank cells in some people's rankings? Does that mean that they aren't in the top 25k of that category? If so, then I feel like I'm being rated lower because I have numbers in everything compared to people above me who have lots of blanks. If you filled in their blanks they'd drop out and i'd be ranked higher. 

 

Nevermind I guess if I'm understanding then it wouldn't change their score. It means their best hof rank is better than my best rank basically.