What tactic would you suggest when been assaulted from territories that cannot be assaulted back?
HT vs Nameless Alliance Sector 7 Showdown
Started by RandyMcSplooge [3391107] on in Faction Discussion.
Posts archived: 933 / 933 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
So your admitting your also being a pussy for employing fake wall tactics?
I'm not entirely sure you thought your argument here through...
I see several non fake walled territories for HT/anti nameless.
On the contrary there isn't a single non fake walled territory on blue lands for HT etc to attack.
We have no walls at all, no fake cause we don't need them and no real because u guys fill them all upp with fakes 😝
As an outside observer you have to do a hat tip here to HT and co. I thought it was 30/70 when I first understood the parameters of what was permissible.
Old strong bastards being absolute bastards.
No Darth that was a direct question not an argument.
That tactic would be: not plot against and lie to our neighbours of 2 years in the first place which would warrant a pre emptive strike, when we know that there is a weird border and relation between those we plot and lie against and their allies, is a pretty good tactic
We asked HT to stay out of this, HT said it would. And then it didnt, it chose to plot on knowing full well that the OBN border was right there.
You made your bed, lay in it.
Also... youre on the same side as the guy that is trying to play extortions when having not even touched a single racket xD xD its giving us a great laugh in Nameless xD when is he going to stop claiming he isnt assisting HT when he just spent the last 3 weeks fakewalling for them and their allies? xD
You hadnt been paying attention then to the rest of your alliance or any fake walls throughout the past 3 weeks, just because you dont have any this minute isnt a leg to stand on lol
You made your bed, lay in it.
NGL they seem to be perfectly happy laying in it.
That's what I was wondering. Based on posts earlier, sounded like HT and co were winning and had taken more territory. Is that true and Prynce is just acting tough or am I missing something?
Tactics : What ever it takes to win ...it's ok to be a looser just don't be a sad looser !!
Loser is a noun for someone who fails or doesn't win (opposite of winner), while looser is a comparative adjective meaning "more loose" or "less tight,"
As a reminder to the obnoxious Americans and Brits who think everyone on the internet is one of them... for many people, even some in those countries, English is not their first language. While assisting them with correct spellings or correct terms and their use cases can be helpful, doing so publicly not only makes you look obnoxious and arrogant, but also like a giant asshole.
On one hand yes, on the other hand, non natives are 100x worse about this.
As an American that played League on EU servers before, any time people got upset I'd say I'm from Romania or Turkey and instantly start getting racist comments and insults about my bad English from people who could barely speak English good times.
Come on Prynce, since this war started you have been the Nameless voice of reason over the course of the war so far.
If that is your perspective on the appropriate tactics then ok. The footsoldiers do not often get learn of the politics until its gone so far as to become orders as a result.
1), Nameless had the element of surprise with a co-ordinated attack - 7 on 1 i think was the initial count. Nothing to be ashamed of, if a war is going to break out someone has to fire the first salvo.
2). Nameless has a massive advantage of numbers to call on.
3). Nameless has access to territories they can fall back too that cannot be assaulted by HT.
4). Take up the extortion issue with Woke i suppose.
So what tactics can HT utilise to negate all of the advantages you have enjoyed so far?
This.
And Prynce. As you know from our talks, i dont share your view on who started this war. But the fact is that the first attack in this war was 7 nameless factions jumping on HT all at once.
I urge you to come back to our diaglogue, and land a long lasting peace agreement.
Someone needs to pull up networth charts of each side to see how each is doing.
Didn’t you have a long lasting agreement before filling nearly all of your TT slots?
Quite possible planning a suprise attack, having that leaked and now crying out for a “long lasting” NAP is not the greatest idea tactically…
No. We never had an agreement with neither OBN or Nameless. That is what we are seeking now.
And we were attacked, not the other way around. Yes we did not feel safe as we knew nameless consider this "their" land and wanted us gone. Therefore i made the NWA group on discord.
We have been over this issue so many times now. Time to move on.
Both OBN and Nameless have been informed that NWA wants all the blue land on the picture below. This is mainly crappy sector 7 land, and nothing much to cry about.
Both OBN and Nameless have been informed that NWA wants all the blue land on the picture below.
Now I may not be an expert; but doesn’t appear like you want a peace agreement there; or else you’d be negotiating a mixture for both sides.
What you’re asking is for them to bend to your demands, not come to a peace agreement.