Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

deleted

Started by Addict4sure [3977951] on in Graveyard.

11 replies · 110 views · thread synced · 2 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 12 / 12 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
12
Discussion span
→
People posting
6
Likes on archived posts
4
Authority score
36 / 100
Historical score
20 / 100
Story score
55 / 100
Engagement score
68 / 100
pdk [3626257] · #5

I have no idea what happened, but you seem a nice guy, also the ai disclaimer for formatting (i assume the conversation) is thoughtful or some shit

 

anyway screenshot convos so i can figure out what happened

Blackganox90 [3598209] · #7

Yeah so you cant just term every war when youre on silver.... that wont work well. get to gold first.

 

But regarding the situation:

  • Just win the real war bud, all solved. Make em eat their shoes.
  • Also, the conversation I just read isnt professional at all, if you start formally youre probably better off.
Addict4sure [3977951] · #10

yoo hi spidy lol

 

Here is a shorter, easier summary:

  • Background: A new, busy faction leader (Addict4sure) prefers simple "termed wars" to save time.

  • Negotiation Failure: Communication broke down before the war started due to opponent inactivity and vague answers ("maybe"), leading to confusion over whether the war was real or termed.

  • The Deal Dispute: The opponent proposed getting 3,200 points first. The author typed "DONE," but immediately questioned if the opponent's weak faction could actually reach that score, leading to an argument.

  • Current Situation: The author's faction is leading (581 vs. 456), but the opponent claims the author broke war terms and is threatening to report them to allies and forums.

  • Main Request: The author wants to know if they were in the wrong, how a new leader should handle this, and is willing to apologize if necessary.