can confirm charm is a good egg and a 10* pub is the place for crimers
BrotherWen: forum
BrotherWen [2813636] Level 69 Ducks of Slacken DoQ Co-leader
- Forum posts (Torn's count)
- 548 observed
- Archived posts
- 526
- Threads started (archived)
- 12
Boards
From the 526 newest archived posts.
- General Discussion
- Graveyard
- Questions & Answers
- Trading Post
- Politics & Law
- Achievements
- Faction Discussion
- Faction Recruitment
Threads started
- Giving faction away says I did it with Ched
- Are Law FIrm spies more effective than Army spies?
- faction/caches api route broken
- You can search forums by user AND text - show it
- Donkey Adoption Certs - 125m per
- - Donkey Adoption Certificates, 150m per
- Guides to actively trading stock market?
- Revert the changes to points armoury.
- Selling Dectective Specials - flight delay!
- Good intermediate-level money-makers?
- Like talking shit? Come talk shit with the Ducks
- To win a RW cache, do you need to score 30%?
Most-liked posts
Likes as archived at fetch time, adjusted for how long each post had been up. Scored posts only; the full score pass runs after the import.
There is a strict faction routine:
- Morning Shit Talk (breakfast is the most important shit-talk of the day)
- Elevenses Banter (what about second shit-talk?)
- Lunchtime Japes
- Afternoon Repartee
- Evening Wisecracks
- Nightcap Bullshit
6 days a week. Sunday is reserved for resting in contemplative silence, brewing up bullshit for Monday morning.
Thats it, come talk shit. We also do ranked wars. We don't talk as much shit then.
Just using the UI, I can go to my profile and see all my forum posts.
This is the search string for that with my player id:
search&q=by:2813636
You can even substitute my name and it stilll works
search&q=by:BrotherWen
Using the forum search feature, I can see all posts with the words "torn"
This is the search string for that:
search&q=torn
What the UI doesn't expose is that you can combine these to search for posts from a specific player.
All the posts I've made with the word "torn" in them:
https://www.torn.com/forums.php#!p=search&q=by:BrotherWen%20torn
"%20" is how spaces are encoded in URLs, so this is a very simple query.
This functionality is documented in the wiki but it's silly to bury it deep in the documentation, and unreasonable to expect your players to be manually editing URLs.
Adding this would be as simple as adding the "player" field to the search box and adding it to the URL construction, and it's super useful for lots of reasons.
No one cares your text is bold
Set it back to regular and depend on the strength of your banter, not the weight of your font, coward
Fedded for 7 days for obscene content
Previously fedded for 3 days for obscene content
First case: Adult Novelties company banner contained gaped hentai anuses
Second case: Adult Novelties company banner contained mostly covered gaped hentai anuses
As his faction leadership we have advised Noogle to not try and find out exactly how much cover a gaped hentai anus needs to avoid permafed but he's been noncommital about stopping.
Recent archived posts
whole globe isn't really doing much to move this conflict in either direction
if it gets to starving iranians it really is over. remember that fighting a shooting war is a significant economic undertaking. build missiles in factories with starving unpaid workers? and the factory needs power, parts, logistics, all those workers and their families need to eat too. people will just not work if they can't survive whilst doing so.
and yeah the irgc can perhaps make a small subset of the economy work whilst the rest falls apart, with enormous human cost and violence, but if they're operating at a fraction of their pre-war strength then a lot of their leverage is also gone.
yeah chinese support will be the one big lifeline iran could get. however china has enormous oil storage, bigger than the us's, and iran is still supplying small chinese refineries at cheap cheap prices. great for china. low production costs whilst everyone else's goes up. to move from that, china would need to really want iran to continue being a serious problem, but they've not done anything so far. perhaps they will, it wouldn't cost them much to bankroll iran and keep them ticking over. they could even count it as payment up front for oil iran is to deliver later.
It’s just a game of chicken at this point - yeah agree, but the problem for iran is that this game of chicken is slightly uncomfortable for the US and absolutely existential for itself.
i think the key point is that iran can take a lot of economic loss but eventually even their authoritarian government needs cashflow to keep things ticking over, and that point is coming up fast, based on how things appear to be breaking down from the outside.
dunno lads
looks to me like the iranian government and society are running out of money. state oil company is 80b in the hole to the government. fuel shortages in one of the largest oil-producing nations on the planet. 2/3rds of working age iranians without jobs. inflation of 70%. Food inflation of 100%+. many workers who have jobs not being paid, or not being paid full salaries. supreme leader not been seen since before he was elected.
at some point in the very near future they'll either need to defund the war effort, defund the proxies, make a deal, enter hyperinflation, or continue the fight whilst letting the country fall apart and shoot anyone who disagrees.
america has a very dirty hand to play as well - in the last 3 week ceasefire, 3 months of normal oil exports slipped out the strait. so the world gets 3 months of supply and iran gets 3 weeks of sanctions relief before the pain goes back on. iran needs to come to the table so this is a hand they can play, perhaps at least once more.
if iran decides to make a play and fires off a bunch more missiles, does that give itself a stronger bargaining position, or does it make the gulf oil nations more willing to take economic losses today in order to keep iran in check for the years to come? uae recently stopped all trade with iran, so, probably the latter.
looks like as long as nothing utterly cretinous happens, trump and co can sit on their butts and watch iran have to make shitty trades until they basically have to make a deal to open the strait on terms favourable to other gulf nations, or come apart at the seams and be economically incapable of doing much at all.
however we've got religious fundamentalists vs actual mentalists so who fucking knows, perhaps we will get wwiii and boots on the ground.
silence newb
get your disgusting 3-month-old hands off my delicious free money
guys it's fine
it's obvious that offertory's brother was using his account when the deal was made
no harm no foul
It's physically impossible if you sleep 8 hours a night
I know chick personally and she's much more powerful than that
happy eid y'all!
I think Zen Buddhism has something on this, I'll check
Would that help?
Are staff enforcing CRLF's rules of the thread or their own guesstimation of what's good for the thread (or just winging it because it's an argument in one thread in one forum of an internet toilet game who cares)
I've long been of the opinion that staff should just drop the pretence of being lawyers and judges and adhere to the much simpler principles of:
- follow the very simple rules we've written down
- don't deliberately make work for the mod team
- don't fuck with the game's revenue
These are basically the rules anyway and trying to write an exhaustive book of laws and law interpretations in different scenarios means staff themselves can't consistently follow all their own rules, let alone communicate them to players, and it creates this bizarre impression of a pantomime courtroom with people enjoying banging the gavel and wearing the silly wigs when they can be bothered, and other times just guillotining someone who 'probably deserves it, vibes based' and when the community goes "wtf happened to the law" they pull the robes and wigs back on in a panic and put the headless corpse on trial.
I feel like they've been boxed into this position over the years by certain members of the community challenging decisions and they feel like they need concrete positions and interpretations to fall back on to justify themselves and it feels all a bit nonsense. IRL you need to know the law 100% because trillions of dollars, the legitimacy of governments, and billions of lives ride on it. This is a game and it's massively burdensome to determine from decades of precedent whether butthole_plumber6767 should catch a perma fed for abetting or merely a several month-long ban, especially when the precedent wholly unconsistent and very fucking vibes-based.
Drop the act, just say "butthole_plumber6767 created work for staff for years and being associated with cheating was just the final straw, don't make work for staff and you have nothing to worry about"
Sorry what were we talking about again I don't remember?
it ain't so bad
if you do a new marketing campaign which pulls in 2x as many users but then you get a slight drop in retention, you still have more users than before
anyway this is off topic, I'm here as part of the multi brigade, who am I supposed to be downvoting?
heck
can confirm charm is a good egg and a 10* pub is the place for crimers
It's not massively unreasonable - IRL grenades don't do AoE damage, they throw out a cloud of metal chunks called shrapnel
ideally shrapnel dispersion is uniform to maximise the chance of hitting people close by, but this is not a certainty
there are instances of grenades detonating quite close to people and they're just lucky enough that the shrapnel completely misses them
so, being close to a grenade and only getting hit in the hand is plausible
what's up for debate is whether this is desirable game design
knowing torn it could be any one of:
- an unannounced change
- a bugfix for a bug players have been relying on for a decade
- a new bug that was introduced and not caught in testing
Congrats on your 6 month old already regurgitating talking points. You must be so proud.
Qualified immunity means you can't directly sue a police officer for following procedures, and instead must sue their department.
This is fine because you still have a legal body to sue for damages. People get big payouts all the time by suing police departments.
The alternative is that people can sue police officers directly for following procedures. Suddenly police officers are constantly personally liable for civil court cases against them.
Reasons this is bad:
- You can't sue people for money they don't have. If you get a $2 million dollar settlement against a police department, they are good for it and will be compelled to pay. If you get a $2 million dollar settlement against Bob you only (at best) get the money he has, which is not likely to be $2 million dollars. Also, juries are more likely to award big settlements against public bodies with budgets of 100s of millions of dollars than they are against real world people with familes and limited means of paying them. Settlements themselves will go down.
- Even if you are a good police officer in every sense of the word, you can still be sued. Even if you are right, you still need to pay for legal defence. This sucks. Leading to point 3
- Being a police officer is a job. People don't like jobs that expose them to big risks, physical or financial. It's why oilfield workers and underwater welders make bank. If you can liable for huge legal risk for being a police officer, then the job must pay a much higher salary to attract the same quality of officer. Either the quality of officers goes to shit, or the wages must go to the moon to pay for the new legal insurance they will all need to take out.
TLDR:
- Lowers the potential payouts for victims of miscarriages of justice
- Either massively increases the cost of hiring police, or massively reduces the quality of policing
yes
I touch grass and try keep in mind the truism: “This too shall pass”
I also try to remember that there’s hardly anything I can do about the situation.
Getting upset at the news doesn’t make the news go away.
It’s also strangely comforting remembering that everyone else is in exactly the same boat.
Reasoning 2 makes no sense.
The US has bases on Greenland. Greenland is large and very lightly populated.
The US can trivially work with Denmark to add more bases. (not anymore though lol)
Denmark is(was) highly bought into NATO, sending troops into the GWOT and having had them come back in boxes.
Military access was never a concern.
Trump wants Greenland for the mineral wealth. As such he should have made a financial offer for it. The end.
What a stupid f**king war the GWOT was
Such a waste of life, of potential
The trillions spent on GWOT could have paid for the development of cold fusion, and the millions of people killed and harmed were all for nothing
work with someone in your faction
GD is not the forum for this.

