Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

SA vs JFK: a war thread reposted, mocked, and closed after a nine-hour war

In April 2015 Ali reposted a war thread for a Subversive Alliance rank war against JFK. The thread drew jokes, a Hydro dispute and reviver complaints, and ran to 598 replies before it was locked.

Apr–May 2015 · published

Involved: Ali [1445620] , IceBlueFire [776] Officer , Penicillin [1517799] Committee , Stretch [1846075] Officer , _Cynic_ [206537] and 8 more

A second attempt at a war thread

Ali [1445620] opened "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" on 28 Apr 2015. The post gave the date as Sunday May 3rd at 1800hrs TCT, with SA to declare for rank.[1]

The stated terms were three guests for SA, locked rosters and no DBs. The post told JFA and MnC to keep trolling out, and warned that off-topic posts would be reported and earn a forum ban.[1]

By the archive's last fetch the thread had 598 replies and 8,975 views, with 119 players posting. It is locked and now sits in the Graveyard board.[2]

Mockery before the war

Bezee [1685702] posted a mock guide to farming karma with a war thread: lay troll baits, send in the faction's trolls, then pretend to be fussed and start a new thread. Penicillin [1517799], a Torn officer/committee member, replied that Bezee had forgotten a Step 5, pretending to be staff who can issue forum bans. Joke[3][4]

boo [1544641] asked whether it was necessary to create the thread again after seeing how the last one went. _Cynic_ [206537] joked that JFK encourages charity work so members feel less guilty when they show none while warring. Joke[5][6]

Stretch [1846075], a Torn officer/committee member, wrote on 29 Apr 2015 that Stretch hoped the war would have as many fireworks as the pre-war forum threads.[7]

The Hydro question and reviver claims

On 01 May 2015 critch [507888] asked why Hydro was now in JFK, and whether as guest or permanent member. Z_junior [247674] replied that Hydro had been in JFK throughout Hydro's Torn life and quoted stats from when Hydro joined. Participant claim[8][9]

_Cynic_ answered critch by asking the same of SA. IceBlueFire [776], a Torn officer/committee member, posted a faction log line showing _Cynic_ had left the faction, and joked about lending a hazmat suit to SA.[10][11]

On 04 May 2015 SuperBeast [340191] complained that Little Stompers, Milk and Cookies, TUS, JFA and PT were attacking SA, attacking and bountying its revivers, and reviving JFK. Allegation[12]

Robb-Stark [1075937] said they stood by their reviver script accusations, claiming eight people had revived them via private chats and all were hospitalised within a minute. Allegation[13]

Myhedin [1348461] congratulated JFK and said only 15 people from a few factions stalked revivers. They said revivers were identified using personal stats graphs. Participant claim[14]

After the war

IceBlueFire wrote on 04 May 2015 that the war had lasted 9 hours. They also wrote that the real reason for gladness at its end was so the thread could finally die.[15][16]

Ali congratulated JFK on the win, alleged that JFK had needed many hangers on and had to bribe people, and asked for a grave. animelive [1564720] wrote that it was not a real war when multiple outsider factions conspire to drive one participant down. Allegation[17][18]

boo wrote that they would stop if SA kicked Trish and Ali. Dave [272331] wrote that the main thing taken from the war was that the system needs to cater for longer wars.[19][20]

On 04 May 2015 g_ho [1261819] started a Suggestions thread arguing that closing a war thread should need permission from all factions involved. On 05 May 2015 ded [341315] linked the SA v JFK thread there.[21][22]

Timeline

  1. Ali opens the SA vs JFK thread, announcing a rank war for 3 May.[1]
  2. critch asks about Hydro's place in JFK; Z_junior and _Cynic_ answer.[8][9][10]
  3. After the war, players trade reviver accusations; IceBlueFire says it lasted 9 hours; Ali asks for a grave.[13][15][17]
  4. ded links the thread in a Suggestions thread about who may close war threads.[22]
Original sources 22
  1. Post by Ali [1445620] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  2. Thread "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" (Graveyard) ·
  3. Post by Bezee [1685702] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  4. Post by Penicillin [1517799] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  5. Post by boo [1544641] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  6. Post by _Cynic_ [206537] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  7. Post by Stretch [1846075] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  8. Post by critch [507888] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  9. Post by Z_junior [247674] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  10. Post by _Cynic_ [206537] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  11. Post by IceBlueFire [776] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  12. Post by SuperBeast [340191] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  13. Post by Robb-Stark [1075937] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  14. Post by Myhedin [1348461] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  15. Post by IceBlueFire [776] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  16. Post by IceBlueFire [776] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  17. Post by Ali [1445620] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  18. Post by animelive [1564720] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  19. Post by boo [1544641] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  20. Post by Dave [272331] in "Let's Try This Again... SA vs JFK" ·
  21. Thread "War Threads belong to 2+ Factions, not 1" (Suggestions) ·
  22. Post by ded [341315] in "War Threads belong to 2+ Factions, not 1" ·

Forum sources link to TornLife's archive of the thread, shown as the players wrote it; each archived thread links on to the original on torn.com.

How to read a story

Every statement in a Torn Story is checked against the archived posts it cites. Statements without a label are established: the record shows them directly. Everything else is labelled and says who is speaking.

Established
The record shows it directly: a post and its date, staff's own words, a thread's figures or TornLife data.
Participant claim
What someone involved said about their own actions or experience. Their account, not verified.
Allegation
An accusation a player made, attributed to them. Never TornLife's finding.
Joke
Banter or trolling, presented as such.
Generated by TornLife from 22 sources · verified · model claude-sonnet-5

Drafted by a language model from the archived posts listed above, then checked three ways before publication: TornLife's validator (every number and citation must match the sources), deterministic statement rules (no unlabelled allegation, no real-world personal details, no claims about why anyone was federally jailed) and a separate critic and fact-checker that read each statement against its sources. It reports what players said; it is not Torn's own statement.

See the evidence

People in this story

Names link to each player's TornLife profile as last observed now, not at the time of the story.