Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

WSSB insider-info thread: negative balances posted after money was removed

In January 2017 Champion opened a thread on money removed from players who profited on WSSB. Players, officers and an admin argued over who leaked, who was punished and whether the punishment was fair.

2017–2019 · published

Involved: Champion [1927067] , bogie [148747] Admin , mug [553318] Committee , Untouchable [1360035] Committee , Dolfwagos [1900418] Committee and 9 more

A thread of screenshots

Champion [1927067] opened "WSSB insider info bulletin" in General Discussion on 04 Jan 2017. The opening post showed a result for Nash [1825532] with Money on hand: $-132,698,342,613 and noted that Nabisco had been removed from committee.[1][2]

Champion alleged that insider abuse had produced huge profits, and asked what players thought of Ched finally doing something about it. Allegation[1]

By the archive's last fetch the thread had 417 replies and 8,015 views. 134 different players posted in it, and 15 of the posts were written by Torn staff, officers or moderators.[2]

Negative balances are listed

Harley [258120] replied the same day with a list of results and said it would be updated. Entries included Hank [1732212] at Money on hand: $-62,074,801,431 and BraveKath [1815519] at $-3,851,717,087.[3]

Mat-Senpai [952164] started a separate thread, "WSSB aftermath", on 04 Jan 2017 to list affected players. dESTROYS [67441] later pointed to the first thread, writing that there was already a thread on the topic.[4][5]

Mat-Senpai wrote that 450b+ had been removed from 18 people. Participant claim[6]

Untouchable [1360035], listed as a Torn officer/committee, posted "Updated numbers, it's 573b taken now lol".[7]

Admin bogie [148747] wrote that the people who had money deducted still won out, because money made afterwards was not removed, only the WSSB profit. Bogie also wrote that it was interesting the change was made retroactively rather than preventing such issues in the first place.[8][9]

Denials, accusations and complaints

Naako [482424] wrote that they never once fed any information to slick. They wrote that Ched had leaked the WSSB change before the announcement, and that they were shocked to be taken off the committee. Participant claim[10]

CindyFury [345050] alleged that 70bill went into the pocket of Nabisco's spouse during the WSSB climb, was later deducted, and that the money had been sent for Nabisco to invest. Allegation[11]

Alexstrasza [1825532] wrote that the person who actually leaked the information received no financial punishment while the deduction fell on a spouse. They called this "an absolute crock of shit" and said they would make the money back. Participant claim[12]

Dollhouse [1962958] wrote that there was no proof of cheating and that doubt did not justify such measures. The post had 6 likes and 12 dislikes. Participant claim[13]

mug [553318], listed as a Torn officer/committee, alleged that SA was full of cheaters and that midknight gave out insider info to faction mates. Allegation[14]

Proxima [1879587] wrote "Cried my way out of it". Dolfwagos [1900418], listed as a Torn officer/committee, wrote that Prox's money was reversed and returned because the system had made a mistake. Participant claim[15][16]

Vernunzio [730674] wrote that the thread seemed like "a bunch of cheaters calling each other cheaters" and compared it to a soap opera. Participant claim[17]

Later references

On 27 Jan 2019 CRLF [2095076] linked the thread in "F......king...Staff and Idiot staff" as a refresher on the "WSSB insider information investigation", and compared it to the MMCP situation.[18][19]

Timeline

  1. Champion opens "WSSB insider info bulletin" with Nash's -$132,698,342,613 result.[1]
  2. Harley posts a running list; Mat-Senpai opens "WSSB aftermath".[3][4]
  3. Untouchable posts that 573b has been taken; bogie writes that only the WSSB profit was removed.[7][8]
  4. Alexstrasza objects that the person who leaked got no financial punishment. Participant claim[12]
  5. CRLF links the thread as a refresher in a later dispute.[18]
Original sources 19
How to read a story

Every statement in a Torn Story is checked against the archived posts it cites. Statements without a label are established: the record shows them directly. Everything else is labelled and says who is speaking.

Established
The record shows it directly: a post and its date, staff's own words, a thread's figures or TornLife data.
Participant claim
What someone involved said about their own actions or experience. Their account, not verified.
Allegation
An accusation a player made, attributed to them. Never TornLife's finding.
Generated by TornLife from 19 sources · verified · model claude-sonnet-5

Drafted by a language model from the archived posts listed above, then checked three ways before publication: TornLife's validator (every number and citation must match the sources), deterministic statement rules (no unlabelled allegation, no real-world personal details, no claims about why anyone was federally jailed) and a separate critic and fact-checker that read each statement against its sources. It reports what players said; it is not Torn's own statement.

See the evidence

People in this story

Names link to each player's TornLife profile as last observed now, not at the time of the story.