n/a
na
Started by Sonic [1591750] on in Questions & Answers.
About this thread
Posts archived: 10 / 10 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.
- Archived posts
- 10
- Discussion span
- →
- People posting
- 10
- Likes on archived posts
- 23
- Authority score
- 59 / 100
- Historical score
- 20 / 100
- Story score
- 36 / 100
- Engagement score
- 60 / 100
Most-liked replies
- Gorgonzola [1300528]
· 6 likes ·
Abuse shouldn't be anonymous to staff. If they warned you I can only assume the content was unacceptable. - Ohadik [424017] Wiki Contributor
· 5 likes ·
Just so you know even in the old system, if a player got a real offensive anonymous message, and they still didn't know who it was, staff could still see who sent it and read it. Here's a pro tip …
Mentioned in this thread
Abuse shouldn't be anonymous to staff. If they warned you I can only assume the content was unacceptable.
The staff can read anonymous mails if they have to ie to stop potty mouths. No one else should be able to find out it is you sending the mail though, its probably a little bug that needs fixing.
Just so you know even in the old system, if a player got a real offensive anonymous message, and they still didn't know who it was, staff could still see who sent it and read it.
Here's a pro tip to avoid your warnings. Stop being a dumbass and play nice.
If people are supposed to "play nice" then what's the point of even having anonymous messages?
MikeDelaney [1591750]I honestly don't see the point in completing a full education course to find out that people can easily trace my 'anonymous' messages, thought it would be fun to piss people off with it and they just reported it so i get f**king warnings :'(
Just wanna see who else thinks that there should be a real anon message function.
People can't trace who sent it staff can and even if you were sent a warning staff wouldn't have told the person who reported you that it was you who sent it.The Education course isn't a "Get out of jail free" card entitling you to mail people and say whatever you want where the normal mail rules don't apply. The same rules apply to anon mails as to normal mails so if you don't want warnings then don't break them
Mentions: Sonic [1591750]
JoeMorgan [1479656]If people are supposed to "play nice" then what's the point of even having anonymous messages?
The ability to send mails anonymously does not automatically mean you need to abuse others and 'play nasty'. I sometimes send joke messages to friends, through this feature, and see if they can work out who I am (subtle hints). Not everything has to be so hostile.
Mentions: Mauss [1479656]
If you thought it would be completely anon so you could use it to break rules then you are sadly mistaken. There is limits to what you can and can't do and trying to use something to abuse or break rules just won't fly here.
Grow a pair and either tell them yourself or don't use it.
The anon mail is now fixed,I like it this way, no more keyboard warriors talking tough. I hope it stays this way forever
Sending Anonymous emails is incredibly useful if you know how to best utilize it. If you're using it to abuse people, you're doing it wrong. I use it to playfully taunt people, throw people off their groove, etc etc. There are ways of "messing" with people that are neither rude nor unduly hostile or cruel.