A co leader is a leader, they have access to clean out the vaults, armouries, declare and manage wars but can't assign upgrades. That's a ****ing joke. If you don't trust your coleader to assign upgrades then they shouldn't be in that position to begin with.
Faction upgrade suggestions
Started by Beerstein [1322136] on in General Discussion.
Posts archived: 191 / 191 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch
A co leader is a leader, they have access to clean out the vaults, armouries, declare and manage wars but can't assign upgrades. That's a ****ing joke. If you don't trust your coleader to assign upgrades then they shouldn't be in that position to begin with.
There should be yes or no confirmations when you select an upgrade.
44
This! ^
May be a few mistakes made if not sorted, but as co leader i cant do much anyways xD
when you click on it you can unset the unlock you made which looks like it won't cost anything to do, and it gives you 1 minute to make sure you want to cancel the unlock
I have to agree with this. If co-leaders arent trusted to pick upgrades, why have access to all the important stuff?
Maybe they see a need to weed out factions with inactive leaders.
If that's true, this is an asinine way of doing it. It's effectively giving an inactive leader even more power than they need. It would be endorsing a forced handicap without the choice of the faction. There are better solutions to "weed them out."
Oversight is more likely.
Best i can tell i would suggest reverting it. Currently gives of the impression of a pile of crap far inferior to the pervious system with no hope of getting better anytime soon.
tbh everyone should be able to click around and just not "Assign" the respect. Like you can in the Permissions and OC pages. It would certainly make the whole system more accessible and drive interest.
The only interesting thing in this update is why they would bother releasing it in such a half done state. Seems poorly planned.
The ideal situation would be that foxxeh realises the coleader doesn't have the power anymore and gives having leadership
But not likely to happen in foxxeh case sadly
Over engineered crap on a game that's going down the pan, knock yourself out with the development team ched, long live the cash cow!
Handed back leadership to Rekker because he's more active. Goodbye my dear leaderspot. You will be missed. [:cry:]
Goodness! :D
Ideally, Foxxeh hands over the position to Navin and Mud becomes Co. If that's not possible, admin intervention would be nice - forcibly demote Foxxeh to regular faction member status, and put in Navin/CB/Mud/Etc.
Adding the function to upgrade for Co-Leaders helps, but it would not fix the problem we've had for a while now. I don't want to jump ship if I don't have to.
I feel like it's a good time to show this picture.
Not mines obviously.
[image: profileimages.torn.com]
![[image: profileimages.torn.com]](https://profileimages.torn.com/4d66fc6c-f223-3e55-1.jpg){kind=link}
There's already a system in place to replace inactive leaders. I don't see it as an issue.
The goal is to not have admin intervention. You're forcefully removing something from an "active" player that you have no right to take from them. What she is doing is deliberately holding your faction hostage because of some sort of power trip that she can't relinquish. I've never had a problem with her myself, but i can't help but feel bad for her faction as they are all stranded by her selfishness.
You'd be too busy on holiday when the faction needs you anyway tbh
Anyone else confused on what to do? What are we suppose to unlock first, what are the upgrades to unlock?
I thought the announcement would of been a bit more clear on what to do instead of saying faction trees are here, be careful what you unlock since there is no going back :/ would be nice to see more unless leaders can only see it.