With the new changes in the patch to worker efficiency dropping to 0 over a period of 10 days some directors have gotten rather salty.
[image: i.imgur.com]
Personally i'm 100% behind the changes it dives the competitive nature of how companies SHOULD be. It makes life more difficult for the multi abusers and It combats directors benefiting off 100+ and 1000+ day old inactive employees. Seems like a Win Win for me.
That being said perhaps we could have a system as follows...
Each member of staff receives an allocated amount of days annual leave per year. Let’s say 28 days. They can take this all at once or over 28 different days throughout the year.
How would this work?
Edit: The holiday could be added to the trade section displaying under the other six possible things that can be traded
[image: i.imgur.com]
You have added 7 days holiday to the trade...
Possible side effects
Edit: Once the employee returns from their vacation perhaps they receive a random chance to get a 1-28% productivity bonus that degenerates over a week/two weeks. (Inline with how real life vacations boost productivity) The longer the holiday the higher the Productivity boost. People that booked 1 day off receive a 1% boost on returning to work. 2 days 2% etc...
When the director receives the notification, they have the option to offer the vacation as paid or unpaid.
A employee that is fired receives none of the previously agreed company allocated holiday days. Yes this opens up the possibility that directors could fire high payed staff that are about to cash in for un-allocated vacations but that would be a very short sighted move and damage the company image in the long run.
Time in service entitlement
Employees would automatically receive time in service entitlements of 1, 3 , and 5 days following completion of 1, 3 and 5 full years service within an annual leave year (up to a total of 5 extra days). This time in service could work like days in a faction does. It wouldn't be necessary to have continuous unbroken days merely total days served in that company type.
Other simpler suggestions
[image: i.imgur.com]
[image: i.imgur.com]
[image: i.imgur.com]
Personally i'm 100% behind the changes it dives the competitive nature of how companies SHOULD be. It makes life more difficult for the multi abusers and It combats directors benefiting off 100+ and 1000+ day old inactive employees. Seems like a Win Win for me.
That being said perhaps we could have a system as follows...
Each member of staff receives an allocated amount of days annual leave per year. Let’s say 28 days. They can take this all at once or over 28 different days throughout the year.
How would this work?
- A member of your company applies for a vacation.
- The director of the company receives the request via a notification in their events just like how they do with applications to the company.
- The director accepts their vacation request. This locks their activity related productivity, Drug addiction/Need for rehab penalties in place as the time of the authorised vacation. (Not the time of application). Encouraging people to rehab before going away.
- Once the person is on vacation their productivity at the time of vacation is locked in place or reduces ever so slightly, perhaps only a few % a day. This could encourage people to rehab before their holiday and would allow people going offline due to real life events and holidays.
Edit: The holiday could be added to the trade section displaying under the other six possible things that can be traded
[image: i.imgur.com]
You have added 7 days holiday to the trade...
Possible side effects
Edit: Once the employee returns from their vacation perhaps they receive a random chance to get a 1-28% productivity bonus that degenerates over a week/two weeks. (Inline with how real life vacations boost productivity) The longer the holiday the higher the Productivity boost. People that booked 1 day off receive a 1% boost on returning to work. 2 days 2% etc...
When the director receives the notification, they have the option to offer the vacation as paid or unpaid.
- If the vacation is a paid one the company will need to have the funds to pay for the entire pay period the employee is off. They recieve this as a lump sum after returning to the workforce the end of their vacation.
- If the vacation is unpaid the employees wages are automatically dropped to 0 for the period of time they have booked off.
- The director has the option to part pay some of the allocated days, or any combination of none or all of them.
A employee that is fired receives none of the previously agreed company allocated holiday days. Yes this opens up the possibility that directors could fire high payed staff that are about to cash in for un-allocated vacations but that would be a very short sighted move and damage the company image in the long run.
Time in service entitlement
Employees would automatically receive time in service entitlements of 1, 3 , and 5 days following completion of 1, 3 and 5 full years service within an annual leave year (up to a total of 5 extra days). This time in service could work like days in a faction does. It wouldn't be necessary to have continuous unbroken days merely total days served in that company type.
Other simpler suggestions
[image: i.imgur.com]
[image: i.imgur.com]