Ranked warring : Exhibition wars

Not finding a lot of good matches for you. Asskickers is too small but they have great stats.If they picked up a few more members, they'd make a good match.

[image: gyazo.com]

If ranked wars would work the same as old chains. I think the main difference will be that lower FC's could not afford revives.

Per request, here is the one for SA One Punch

[image: gyazo.com]

I hope ranked warring will be league based more then FFA like it used to be.

instead of just talk you say? you may want to talk to your actual leaders at monarch who i have messages from declining 1v1 between the 2 factions or a 2v2 with us and PT v MON and ME,seems the one only one in these factions who "talks" and wont fight is you RA?

and just an edit to be clear,i think monarch has the edge in a 1v1.

Are these in any particular order?

So based on some posts in here we have the following potential fights and interested ones..


Sub 2M respect factions

Crime Syndicate - The United

Immortal Defiance vs Desert Phoenix

The collective vs BOW - Hooligans



Sub 3M respect factions

Yakuza - Infinity vs Teufel Hunden Barracks or

Winter is coming - Riot


Sub 4M respect factions

Black Statues vs The Mighty Ducks or Adrenaline

Darkside vs El Condor



5M+ respect factions

SA one Punch vs Catalysis

The Quidnunks HQ Vs The Black Hand (rematch?)

PT-Shadowrazers vs Next Level ?


PnB vs ME/NSIV






Factions that comes into mind and some that has shown interest


Damage Inc?

Sport Club?

The Wolverines

Dystopia

Plata o Plomo

Toxic Reign

The Brotherhood of War

Silver Hand

DP warriors

White Rabbits

Torn Galactic Republic

Ðestructive Anomaly

PT-Family

Nuclear Fusion/Blast/Armageddon/Dimension.

HT

Vinerri

The UnLeashed Sykoz

The Rifle Company

The rifle barracks

MMCP

Equilibrium

You forgot PnB Penguins vs NS IV, which will happen eighter way, ranked testing or not.

Edit: Seems like you didn't split up PnB and PnB Penguins. PnB will fight ME, PnB P will fight NSIV

Think it favours Elo closeness, cause the xanax totals and SE totals in that grouping are pretty different. Going by xanax and SEs I would have expected to see my faction in there.

Ahhh okay that makes more sense because yeah that’s a wild mix

Dead or alive wants in as well

You seem to have left out WPNG and onion smugglers from the list

And us!!!

And us!!! :P

A 2v2 is a troll offer.

Either Mentos or R* would have gotten shit on by either PT or CR before the merge. And we didn't gain enough to come close to closing the gap post-merge.

I'm sure there's other guests and whatever who can balance sides better than a non-starter offer.

There are two components to the report: gathering all the stats and then arranging the order.

Gathering the stats is all "science". I have queries that compile the results for each faction from two years of history. In this case, I chose Feb 2021 - Sept 2021. Anyone could check the stats for a single faction by using the API to check each member's stats today, in February, and comparing the two. ("_curr" is lifetime total and "_diff" is difference since February).

The initial set is based on length of max chain and number of current members. I check for a range, depending on the faction. So 50 members might get results for 55-65 and 98 members might get 95-100. This initial set may give me 20-40 factions in the result.

Arranging the results is more "art". But since I do not change the totals, you can always change the order of the columns if you don't like the results. I apply the Excel color filter, which automatically compares all the values in the row and ranks them by color (green is highest, red is lowest). I remove some measures that are not useful (like defends lost) and I remove ones that aren't useful for that faction (such as SEs used for low-level factions).

The stats are ordered, top to bottom, in roughly the order of importance. Activity, elo and xanax are at the top, and SEs (when used), cans, boosters, consumables are next. The exact order isn't important because it's impossible to say if one measure is more important absolutely.

Once the colors are applied, it's obvious which factions are not a good match at all. All-green columns and all-red columns indicate a poor match and are removed.

The remaining factions are ordered left-to-right roughly by their results based on the color, with strongest factions to the left. This part is the "art" -- there's no way to absolutely say which factions are strongest. However, since all the data is still there, you can still decide for yourself which faction is the best match. I consider the first stats the heaviest in deciding the order of the columns.

TORN Watch Citizens is willing to test this. Requesting a faction that isn't too strong; we aren't a big faction :)

Sacrifice is willing to participate to the beta. Any opponent will do we don't back down