Anarcho monarchy

Anarco monarchy and the tao chi on conterdiction.

The tao ask's to seek balance in conterdiction 

Spent a few years debating anarchist and listening to your arguments 

Your issue is the conterdiction of anarchy and a monarchy.

My base is that in a civilization, there is a balance of power based on prinicabels. 

Its a sytem based on a hamany of power.

You can not see the anarchy with a king.

So you ignore my ideas of community, thinking a ideal can overshadow the people's power.

I studied how we think in groups and figured the best structer for community.

Give history examples of systems that worked and parrels to my ideals.

I built anarchy with a king, were like the dollar his power is only measured by the pepoles grit.

I beg to offer milita branches of the union and ask committee to at least think of offering something to defend against any kind of terrany. And all y,u can ttink of is what Europe did vs what Confucius taught.

Load image

YouTube video LQCU36pkH7c

[image: i.kym-cdn.com]

Load image

Basically a confederation.

No, its more of a syndication of parts bound together by a empire.

Nhe community 

Republic 

Union

And crown 

4 powers represented and given a medium so that they may have a voice.

I prefer my system to stay off the drugs.

How is history drugs, how is pholosophy and phycology?

What is this king "for" exactly?

Well the teo chi say's te lead from behind, by example. That a good leader is not someone who wants to lead.

 Amongst che powers i expressed, They are the calmination of the nations power.

The republic is there staff of power, the republic is a separate power of economy to government, and che crown holds three chairs there in. So even there his power is not absolute.

The communities each have the own will and power, the people are the voices the crown speaks.

The monarchy is to keep its parts in agreement, and to work with the world at large in diplomacy and economics.

There to make sure the empire is maintained and capitol is put wece its needed.

They can not make laws, but they can enforce any that exist from the communitys or mediate any conflict there in, least anything more major then a civil case.

Courts of law can handle everything thing else.

Still confused on why the king is necessary in this instance and not just have an elected position 

Consistency of politics. They also last longer in history 

So consistent policy is more important than good policy? And you say they last longer but that long period of monarchies is mostly one monarch violently overthrowing another.

If you're going to have small communities as the center of political organization than a king seems totally out of scale.

Europe ignored the keys ef power believing in one man and the destiny of his loins.

Communitys themselves can get to mutrh pover and become a issue to its naibors.

 Name each key of power, and set the binders to it, sothat it serves the nation the best.

To futher my point, the holy romen empire lasted ten centuries.

And that was with a shaky center of power that was debatable at the best of times.

A empire that really only fell because war tactics changed with time.

Also policy by council is the best policy. Not like the king has absolute authority, his is the authority of the people. Its not his power.

Even found a example in ancient India. Also ,one of the longer lastering empires in history.

I gave each key of power a name, and function.

ten centuries....

So you're counting from what...Julius Cesar all the way to the conquest of Constantinople?  Lotta ups and downs in that line of government.  Whole lot of generals killing the ruler and taking over only to be murdered by their patricians and have someone else take over instead etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Byzantine_revolts_and_civil_wars

I said holy romen from 800bc to 1800bc.....

I also listed that it had its issues, but those wore more of a constiqusce of its founding.

Also not fond of how eroup ruled. Too much god in nhe way of policy. And thats coming from a man of faith.

A thousand years, yes yes, i was a little mistaken, but still good legs.

I know why they fell, I know why a lot of nations fell.

I learned my economics and politics in the bookl of history.