Skip to content
TORNLIFE More

Steadfast idea [350+]

Started by -HellHound- [1580868] on in Suggestions.

112 replies · 1.08k views · thread synced · 4 days ago · View on torn.com
About this thread

Posts archived: 113 / 113 posts (100%) · the total is Torn's reply count + the opening post at the last fetch

Counted by TornLife from the archived posts.

Archived posts
113
Discussion span
→
Authority score
56 / 100
Historical score
50 / 100
Story score
69 / 100
Engagement score
83 / 100

People posting, likes and official posts are not counted for this thread yet: on threads longer than one page they come from a periodic pass over the archive, which has not covered it.

Most-liked replies

  • Chedburn [1] Admin · 37 likes ·
    Hi everyone, I'm going to need more context as to why this is a good idea from a gameplay perspective. Sure this would make things more comfortable and easier for factions and players, but that doesn't mean it's good for …
  • Penetration [2340613] · 11 likes ·
    Yeah I think Ched wanted to force factions to specialize initially. However, his idea for locked in upgrades was quickly changed after backlash from the community. Since it's rotatable, there is more longer a reason to make such a restriction. …
  • -HellHound- [1580868] · 10 likes ·
    Thanks Ched for the review. Firstly, I know of faction members moving factions so they can train with a certain Steadfast set-up and this would stop them having to endure the recruit nightmare. Secondly, I feel that if a faction …
-HellHound- [1580868] · #1 · edited

Currently the Steadfast branch only allows progression of two stat gyms above 10% and one above 15% as below - 

 

 

Suggestion:

Remove this limitation so that all gyms can be planned to their maximum challenges met - benefits members as they can train as they wish and leaders not having to rotate the Steadfast branch.

 

Upgrades can be made all the way to the next challenge (orange).

 

Do these people disagree with the idea or just dislike it???

  • TNARGi disliked your thread
  • L4suicide disliked your thread
Penetration [2340613] · #4

Yeah I think Ched wanted to force factions to specialize initially. However, his idea for locked in upgrades was quickly changed after backlash from the community. Since it's rotatable, there is more longer a reason to make such a restriction.

 

Additionally, if factions want to have more of their branches upgraded at once, they may need to let other perks go until their respect is high enough. If anything, this suggestion adds more value to the respect system.

 

R+

Maks [2811251] Reporter · #10

R+! Wouldn't change much, will let people train as they wish, and will lessen the burden of fac leaders. I only see a benefit with this change tbh. 

 

 

Riot [974353] · #11

to be honest, the current system just serves as a headache and additional admin work, I think opening them all up wouldn't have any negative consequences and just be easier for leadership teams and members alike