give arson margin some leeway

mildly infuriating to see the arson be within 5% margin of error and still get a 'not enough' marker (there's like one door standing how tf are you not gonna pay me at 99% destruction)

so I suggest a margin of acceptability (with maybe reduced payout) instead of complete rejection of the crime being completed 

if it's within the exact parameters, you get full payout, if you're within 1~3%, you get like 75% payout, and from 3~5% you get 50% payout, 5~9% and you get like 25% of the original payout, and only after 10% do you not get paid at all

no? no one likes this?

In the wise words of Hornet

Load image

I've been getting ripped off on "total destruction" arson crimes lately.
For example, for a "3 fire" crime I used EIGHT gasolines. That was gross overkill.  But the firefighters came almost immediately after lighting, and stopped it at 98%. It's a predetermined pass/fail, and whatever you do doesn't matter.

I also had a "2 fire" crime with a requirement of <50% destruction.  I used ONE gasoline.  That should have done about 25% damage.  Left.  Came back to find it did 51%.

These anomalies are getting WORSE as my skill increases.

Also, the < and > signs should actually be less-than-or-equal-to and greater-than-or-equal-to symbols. o/