????????????????????
Every single time I read about this, there is really just more questionmarks coming up.
Last time I read bogie speak about an extension, it was implicitly stated Torn Casinos are "one thing", but an extension literally introducing pets into the game was "quite another", putting said extension up as the breaking point. As if Casinos, particularly those that simply circumvent self-exclusion, were alright & your TORN pet horse would be hellsent in comparison.
Now, "initially this was not seen as a particularly high concern".
Alas, you waited before those Casinos gained traction to the point there is a new one popping up every other week, and now as people seem to apparently like them, that is when you want to first intervene???
I get that making a fuss out of something that hasn't gained traction yet isn't feasible, but the way in which this particular issue is handled - most ironically at one of the very few corners where it would have been completely reasonable to make a fuss out of it as early as possible due to the implications of the content - it just throws additional questionmarks with every single new post regarding this.
Though I'm glad the TORN pet extension has finally made someone aware that external services circumventing your own options particularly in a corner where users can genuinely come in harms way due to addiction might not be okay.